J.D. Vance exposes Minnesota's abortion-at-all-costs industry

J.D. Vance is finally vindicated. During last week's vice-presidential debate, Sen. J.D. Vance accused Tim Walz, Minnesota's DFL governor, of changing Minnesota's abortion laws. Gov. Walz denied that, saying "That is not the way the law is written. … [T]hat’s been misread. And it was fact-checked at the last debate. It’s not the case. It’s not true. That’s not what the law says."

Rep. Harry Niska knows that Gov. Walz isn't telling the truth. Harry tweeted "In fact, @ShannonBream is 100% correct and @Tim_Walz is lying again. The law he signed was far more radical than just restoring Roe v Wade. I know because I tried to help them to “codify Roe” and they rejected my amendment." The language that was in play prior to 2023 said "A born alive infant as a result of an abortion shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born-alive infant." This is what the new law says:

An infant that is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to care for the infant who is born alive.
The earlier version of the law is quite explicit. It said that the medical personnel shall ... preserve the life and health of the born-alive infant. The newly-signed bill says that medical personnel shall care forthe infant who is born alive. The language changes to the law are found 7:10 into this video of Shannon Bream's interview with Gov. Walz:

This is Rep. Harry Niska's tweet on amending the "Codify Roe" bil: Let's be honest about the DFL's push for unlimited abortion. First, Gov. Walz's explanation is utterly dishonest. Rep. Harry Niska's tweet proves that beyond all doubt. If the DFL just wanted to "restore Roe," they could've adopted Rep. Niska's amendment. The DFL rejected Rep. Niska's amendment on a straight party-line vote.

Next, the DFL's abortion-on-demand wing wouldn't have tolerated the betrayal. Anyone voting against abortion-on-demand legislation would've gotten primaried. These days, the DFL runs a 'purity test' against their members. When Sen. Jeffrey Hayden isn't liberal enough, things are getting bad.

Finally, the DFL is running an ad featuring "Dr. Tessmer-Tuck." In the ad, Dr. Tesmer-Tuck says "There's no doubt in my mind that if Minnesota Republicans win this election, they will try to ban abortion. Minnesota Republicans want to take away your right to make your own medical decisions. Minnesota Democrats are working to protect that right."

What a pile of BS. This doctor is a full-time propagandist. The organization that pays her to make those ads (abetterlegislature.org) has been around in varying names since 2010. They specialize in propaganda. The next time they put out an ad that passes the Truth Test, it'll be the first time they will have passed a fact-check.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more