If the Democrats win big next Tuesday

It won't be a surprise to most people to learn that Democrats plan on eliminating or limiting the filibuster if they win big next Tuesday. The good news is that Democrats won't win big next Tuesday. First, it's important to know that Sen. Schumer will be the minority leader come January. Republicans will pick up a net of betwqeen 3-6 seats in the U.S. Senate next Tuesday. That's if people keep voting early in-person or via the mail and day-of voting. Republicans have shattered early voting records for the GOP since early voting started in mid-September.

That being said, the GOP voters must continue to keep voting. The goal must be to come out of this election with as big of majorities in the House and Senate as possible. Growing our House majority will strengthen Mike Johnson's speakership. Further, it'll prevent Democrats from impeaching Trump a third time and from raising taxes on taxpayers in all classes.

Retaking the majority in the Senate will help get Trump's Cabinet confirmed, then help the House pass President Trump's economic agenda. That's essential in cutting taxes and cutting regulations. Those are the keys to cutting inflation and solving the Affordability Crisis.

WAtch this speech by Tim Walz and you'll know why we need to keep him and Kamala Harris as far from this nation's levers of power as possible:

While we must continue to cast our votes, it's apparent that VP Harris's campaign is sinking. Bill McGurn highlights that perfectly in his latest WSJ article:
A week from the election, we have bipartisan consensus on two points regarding Pennsylvania. The first is that the presidential contest is way too close to call. The second is that only one contender has coattails. Both candidates for Senate—Republican challenger Dave McCormick and Democratic incumbent Bob Casey—agree on who that is: Donald Trump.
People should run from the Harris-Walz ticket like they're selling toxic waste. That's what Dave McCormick and Bob Casey are doing. They nothing to do with Harris. It's understandable that McCormick isn't interested in Harris's agenda. He's a Republican. Harris is a San Francisco Democrat. Casey fleeing Harris is understandable, too. He's trying to win a 4th term in the Senate and he'll do anything to stay in power.

Sen. Casey isn't the only Democrat to run from Harris and tie themselves to Trump. Tammy Baldwin is another Democrat who's running an ad highlighting her 'working with' Pres. Trump. She's doing her best to stay in the Senate, too. She's doing her best with the ad to distract from her voting record, which shows she's one of the most liberal Democrats in the Senate.

Baldwin and Casey both have reasons to hide from Harris. That should highlight to us why we shouldn't trust Harris.

Finally, bank your vote this week.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more