Joe Biden's sinister aliases

It isn't often that CNN is caught committing truth in their reporting. When that happens, it's definitely a noteworthy event worthy of media attention. Such a rarity just happened. Nick Arama wrote about it for RedState in this post. In his post, Arama talks about Jake Tapper committing such a truth.

During the panel discussion, Tapper played a clip of Trump debating Biden in 2020, with Trump accusing Hunter of making a fortune in China, Ukraine and Moscow. Biden replied "that simply isn't true." One of the panelists is a former Democrat congressman from Michigan named Andy Levin.

Levin's role in this panel, apparently, was to recite that dads sometimes have blind spots when it comes to their sons. Levin then said "Nothing has tied the President to any of Hunter Biden's dealings. There's no whiff of him being involved or him being implicated in it and I think it's something that voters don't really much about."

It's possible that voters don't care about Hunter's and Joe's corruption. Saying that nothing has tied Joe to Hunter's dealings is BS. That's now disproven by Ed Morrissey's post about Joe Biden's aliases. In his post, Ed quotes the NY Post as saying "Then-Vice President Biden emailed Hunter under the aliases “Robin Ware,” “Robert L. Peters” and “JRB Ware” between 2014 and 2016, keeping his son abreast of scheduled talks with then-Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko and Kyiv Prime Minister Volodymyr Groysman, among other communications The Post first revealed in 2021."

It continues:

The elder Biden had one of his aides, John Flynn, send his daily schedule to the private email address "Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov" at least 10 times between May 18 and June 15, 2016, copying Hunter on a May 26 message with a note about an "8.45am prep for 9am phonecall [sic] with Pres Poroshenko."
Here's the video that directly ties Joe to Hunter: The most recent defense of Joe Biden has been that he's done nothing wrong or that he isn't tied to Hunter's corruption. This Tapper interview with Jamie Comer, the chair of the House Oversight Committee, isn't damning by itself:

Then there's this:
The elder Biden had one of his aides, John Flynn, send his daily schedule to the private email address "Robert.L.Peters@pci.gov" at least 10 times between May 18 and June 15, 2016, copying Hunter on a May 26 message with a note about an "8.45am prep for 9am phonecall [sic] with Pres Poroshenko."
This obliterates Joe Biden's lie that he never spoke to his son about Hunter's business dealings. Look how upset Joe got when asked about this:

WOW! That's the personification of angry! About 3:35 into this video, CNN's correspondent plays the clip of Fox's Peter Doocy asking Joe Biden how many times he's spoken to his son about "Hunter's overseas business dealings:

Biden replied "I've never spoken to my son about his overseas business dealings." These emails from Hunter's laptop say the opposite. They're proof that they spoke about Hunter's business dealings. Further, anyone that's said that there's no evidence of Joe Biden being involved with Hunter's illegal business dealings is lying, too. Let's remember that Hunter didn't register to be a foreign agent, violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act, aka FARA. Additionally, Hunter didn't pay taxes on that income for 2014-15.

Let's be honest as a nation about what this is. Joe Biden sold out the U.S. so his family could get rich. He sold the U.S. out when he got Viktor Shokin fired for investigating Burisma, the corrupt company that his crackhead son worked for. (Yes, Hunter was a crackhead while he worked for Burisma.)

It's time to impeach and convict Joe Biden for these corrupt activities. If it wasn't for the media's protection, Biden would already be out of office. That's the other major scandal in this.

Joe Biden isn't a friendly grandfather-type. He's been a liar-plagiarist for almost 40 years. Check this out, too:

Joe Biden is as corrupt as he is too old to do the job of president of the United States.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more