Donald Trump's forever war?

Obviously, a war that's lasted a few months isn't a forever war. Still, it isn't too soon to question President Trump's exit strategy and his accomplishment goals. The Powell Doctrine summary indicates that President Trump has anwered most of the major questions of the Doctrine:
  1. Is a vital national security interest threatened?
  2. Do we have a clear attainable objective?
  3. Have the risks and costs been fully and frankly analyzed?
  4. Have all other non-violent policy means been fully exhausted?
  5. Is there a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement?
  6. Have the consequences of our action been fully considered?
  7. Is the action supported by the American people?
  8. Do we have genuine broad international support?
It's apparent that President Trump doesn't have "a plausible exit strategy to avoid endless entanglement." His approach to the negotiation phase of the war has been more of a play-it-by-ear or we'll-see-what-happens than a we'll-pound-them-into-the-ground-then-force surrender approach.

It's illogical to militarily pummel an opposing nation, then invite them to a ceasefire followed by negotiations. In the movie Patton, George C. Scott said that you become a hero by making the other sonuvabitch die for his country:

In this instance, help the theocrats meet their 72 virgins. That way, there aren't any negotiations. Eliminate the theocrats, the IRGC and the Basij. That ay, you'll only have normal people to deal with. The key is picking the right objectives to achieve. Right now, that isn't happening. If the Qatari and the Pakistanis offer to host another round of negotiations, diplomatically reject that offer, then finish the job. Dead IRGC soldiers can't obstruct the Strait.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kendall Quall's big mistake

Proof that Tim Walz doesn't care about fraud or other crime

Johnson family statement (unedited)