St. Paul's battle against people of faith

It's obvious that St. Paul isn't interested in either public safety, the Constitution or its spiritual health. It's obvious after reading this KSTP article highlighting "The St. Paul City Attorney’s Office has declined to bring state criminal charges against demonstrators who disrupted a Jan. 18 service at Cities Church. In a statement, City Attorney Irene Kao said videos and other materials related to the Jan. 18 incident were insufficient to establish probable cause and result in a criminal conviction."

The City issued the obligatory letter saying that "This decision should not be interpreted as an endorsement of unlawful behavior or public disorder. The right to peacefully protest is protected, as is the right to exercise one’s religious beliefs. Balancing these equally important rights is paramount to our decision today. However, acts of violence, property destruction, or threats to public safety – none of which occurred here – remain serious concerns and will be prosecuted when supported by admissible evidence."

TRANSLATION: Blah, blah, blah, yada, yada, yada. Don't bother us until it's something important.

Invaders got into the faces of little children and screamed at them. That's while these invaders violated this congregation's First Amendment rights.

Cities Church:

Let's examine another part of St. Paul's statemenmt, the part where they say "The right to peacefully protest is protected." Let's examine the FACE Act, aka the "Freedom of access to clinic entrances Act." The bill's language states "Whoever ... by force or threat of force or by physical obstruction, intentionally injures, intimidates or interferes with or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with any person lawfully exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship."

Getting into the faces of little children is, without question, an act of intimidation. Attorney Kao couldn't be further from the truth than when she said "videos and other materials" from the invasion "were insufficient to establish probable cause and result in a criminal conviction." Does this look like a "peaceful protest?"

God help us if it does.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Proof that Tim Walz doesn't care about fraud or other crime

Johnson family statement (unedited)

Minnesota Department of Education admits it's corrupt