DFL still pushing discredited anti-Christian trans agenda
The First Amendment's text says "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances." The key to this issue as it pertains to the First Amendment is found in the second clause of the Amendment. That's where it says that Congress won't make a law that prohibits "the free exercise" of one's religious beliefs. As with most things the DFL push, the bill is unconstitutional.
Here are some specifics from the bill:HF 3024 also includes a right for foster kids to "request and be supported in obtaining gender-affirming care including counseling, medication, and other supportive services." The bill also has language giving foster youth the right to access "abortion services."In other words, the child would be in charge of major parts of life. The 'parent' would provide a roof over the child's head, some meals and rides to special events which the parents think are counterproducctive to the child. That isn't a parent. That's an automoton.Additionally, Hanson’s bill contains a right for foster children to have "regular contact with communities that reflect the foster youth’s … gender identity and gender expression."
If HF 3024 became state law, alleged violations of the foster youth bill of rights would be examined by a court or an administrative review process. A court would have the power to "remedy" violations of the foster youth bill of rights.
That isn't surprising given that Democrats think of mothers as "birthing people." It's nice that the DFL gives the GOP advanced notice that they aren't the serious party. Good luck on the campaign trail.

Comments
Post a Comment