Is Defend612 DFL's domestic terrorist organization?

Starting immediately, Minnesotans should ask DFL politicians if they support Defend612, an organization that "seeks to support 'resistance to the ICE occupation in Minneapolis,' is promoting two virtual sessions titled 'The People’s Pardon or Jury Nullification,' scheduled in the coming weeks." Jury nullification is illegal because of the oath jurors take before getting seated before trial.

As such, teaching people how to break the law is itself breaking the law. Alpha News reports "A Minneapolis-based activist network is now openly advertising 'jury nullification training,' raising new concerns about the integrity of jury trials in the Twin Cities. Defend612, which seeks to support 'resistance to the ICE occupation in Minneapolis,' is promoting two virtual sessions titled 'The People’s Pardon or Jury Nullification,' scheduled in the coming weeks."

The oath taken by jurors requires them not to formulate an opinion until all evidence has been presented by the prosecution and the defense. They can only start forming opinions once they reach the jury deliberation room.

In an email to supporters, Defend612 described the trainings as a means of "protecting our local heroes through Jury Nullification."

Jury nullification occurs when jurors vote to acquit a defendant despite believing the law was broken, often because they oppose the law itself or how it is enforced.

Last month, Alpha News reported on a Minnesota Democratic Party official urging his followers to use jury nullification in a federal case involving an assault against an immigration enforcement officer. Nick Kruse, a former vice president of the Minnesota Young DFL and current at-large director of Stonewall DFL, wrote in a since-deleted post on X that "no one should be going to prison for defending our city against ICE."

That version of Lady Justice isn't blindfolded. It's prejudiced from the start, making justice impossible. Notice the wording in this interview:

This interviewee called Renee Good's death an "assassination." That isn't justice. That's prejudice. Further, that's prejudice from a 'jury' of a single person.

To Tom Homan:

Is this the action of a domestic terrorist?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Proof that Tim Walz doesn't care about fraud or other crime

Johnson family statement (unedited)

Tim Walz doubling down on Gestapo speech