Chuck Schumer's imminent defeat

Durig the latest version of Schumer's shutdown, Democrats insist that ICE agents muat stop wearing masks. Republicans are holding firm on this, citing as fact that they need to wear those masks to protect themselves and their families from protesters/rioters. Federal judge Katie Menendez's ruling provides the GOP with the ammunition they sought. In the ruling, Judge Menendez wrote "Defendants also presented evidence broadly discussing how immigration enforcement agents have been met with resistance and, in some cases, threats and violence by protestors."

Thanks to this ruling, that claim is no longer just an allegation. It's now a finding of fact. The next time Chuck Schumer or the insufferable Hakeem Jeffries says 'if you've got nothing to hide, take off the mask,' I'd reply that 'my family's life isn't negotiable.' Then I'd add that these supposedly peaceful protesters are the opposite of peaceful. This says it all:

"Defendants also present evidence broadly discussing how immigration enforcement agents have been met with resistance and, in some cases, threats and violence by protestors."

That's more than ample ammunition against the Democrats' claims. One of the things that Democrats demand is that ICE agents stop wearing masks. Currently, they're getting worn to prevent them from getting identified. Since there's no way for Democrats to get the anarchists to stop doxxing ICE agents' families, there's no reason for Republicans to stop wearing masks. Check out the details Sen. Schumer intentionally omitted from this speech:

At minimum, Sen. Schumer intentionally omitted the part that Pretti kicked out the tail light of a government vehicle a week earlier. That implies that Pretti wasn't always stable mentally. At this point, I'd love to know if Sen. Schumer intentionally omitted other things, too.

Further, I wonder if Sen. Schumer realizes that he's playing a losing hand. Something tells me he hasn't noticed it yet.