Joe Biden, Merrick Garland have a legal entanglement on their hands
This is what lawfare looks like. The FBI objected strenuously to invading Mar-a-Lago, at one point saying "We haven’t generated any new facts, but keep being given draft after draft after draft. Absent a witness coming forward with recent information about classified on site, at what point is it fair to table this?"
Call me crazy but I think the Biden DOJ, led by Merrick Garland, should've tabled things before it got to that point. Further, it's appalling to rewatch the tactics used in the FBI's invasion of Mar-a-Lago.This is a debate this nation should've had before the invasion. Frankly, the Bondi DOJ should see whether Jack Smith or Merrick Garland committed any crimes:
When Chuck Grassley starts investigating, alleged bad guys should start worrying:Sen. Grassley is the oldest member in the Senate. He's easily one of the most productive members of the Senate. This is just another example why he's so respected. He's the guy thay uncovered these documents. They're just the most recent bombshell he's uncovered.Received shocking new docs 2day from DOJ & FBI showing FBI DID NOT BELIEVE IT HAD PROBABLE CAUSE to raid Pres Trump's Mar-a-Lago home but Biden DOJ pushed for it anyway
— Chuck Grassley (@ChuckGrassley) December 16, 2025
Based on the records Mar-a-Lago raid was a miscarriage of justice
Read for urself: https://t.co/qbJNT0tcRE pic.twitter.com/ljWdjndhHE
Comments
Post a Comment