WHAM = Activists' Hockey League?
In their reporting, Alpha News also reported "Rachel Stoneberg, 42, a former University of St. Thomas player and 20-year staple in the Women’s Hockey Association of Minnesota (WHAM), shared her “Dear Hockey: Goodbye” letter to social media. In her letter, sent to WHAM on Oct. 10, Stoneberg laments the end of her three-decade long relationship with the sport over the league’s decision to allow biological males to compete on women’s teams."
This is still another encroachment into women’s sports by men. Further, it’s proof that the league is more interested in a political agenda than in player safety:
Citing physical differences, Stoneberg touched on the potential dangers of biological males playing against females on the ice.It's time to admit that the people who run WHAM are misguided activists, not league executives. Further, it's time to tell these types of leagues this isn't ok, that endangering player safety will cost the league extra in insurance."Men’s hockey is a different sport than women’s hockey, and male bodies are built differently than female bodies. These are factual truths that I would hope we can all agree on. If someone has played men’s hockey their whole life, are we confident they can turn off that switch? Or are they going to check someone in a corner, or lay someone out mid-ice, causing a concussion – or worse? There are documented instances of this occurring in WHAM, and yet the association has taken no action," stated Stoneberg.

Comments
Post a Comment