National Border Patrol Council unanimously endorses Donald Trump

When Donald Trump paints his opponents into a corner, they're often left looking a little sheepish. That's what he did to the Harris campaign Sunday, when he proposed an idea to the National Border Patrol Council. Specifically, President Trump proposed "he would set a goal of hiring 10,000 Border Patrol agents and 'immediately' ask Congress to give all agents a 10 percent pay raise. He also pitched a $10,000 'retention and signing bonus' for agents." Almost immediately, the Harris campaign replied, saying "Trump doesn’t care about solving problems, he only wants to run on one. That’s why he killed the bipartisan border bill that would’ve secured the border, despite the fact that it was endorsed by the Border Patrol."

That's a steaming pile of BS from the Harris campaign. First, Harris is the partisan hack who criticized building Trump's wall, calling it a vanity project. Then-Sen. Harris voted multiple times against funding the building of President Trump's border wall, the wall which she now says she supports building. Next, VP Harris often talks about the bipartisan border bill as if it would eliminate illegal border crossings. Actually, it would codify Harris-Biden border policies 'enactedd' through executive action by Biden. Check this out:

Third, the National Border Patrol Council, the union that officially represents the border patrol, , unanimously endorsed President Trump. They didn't just endorse President Trump. The NBPC unanimously endorsed President Trump.

Think of it this way. This endorsement wasn't a strong endorsement of President Trump. It wasn't a Reaganesque landslide of Trump by the NBPC. This endorsement of President Trump was unanimous.That means VP Harris didn't get a single vote for endorsement.

Fourth, these are the men and women who risk their lives to protect us. For them, this isn't a job. It's a calling. How dare this punk political operative insist that President Trump isn't interested in solving the border problem.

Further, it's time for Republicans to go on the offensive. Let's remind voters that President Trump's policies worked. According to this chart, Biden had 2 years (FY2022-FY2023) where he let in more illegal aliens than Trump let in his entire 4-year term:

Further, it's time to remind voters that the House passed H.R.2, which codified Trump's policies into law. The House passed the bill on May 11, 2023 but Senate Democrats wouldn't even give the bill a committee hearing. REMINDER: None of the vulnerable Senate Democrats lifted a finger to push for a committee hearing for H.R.2. These vulnerable Democrats have portrayed themselves as moderates, especially Jon Tester and Bob Casey. They aren't moderates in terms of their governing.

Finally, it's time to re-elect President Trump, re-elect the House Republican majority and throw out the Democrat majority in the Senate. Democrats are anti-fossil fuel and anti-border security. We're better off with unified GOP governance in DC.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Blistering Barack's butt (bigtime)

Image
This past weekend, Barack Obama tried spreading the blame around for Hamas's murderous rampage of Oct. 7. This blistering op-ed hints that Mr. Obama isn't the effective communicator that he once was. Obama initially insisted that "nobody's hands are clean" from the Oct. 7 Massacre. Liel Leibovitz, the Editor at large of Tablet Magazine wrote this op-ed questioning Obama's intellectual honesty. After Obama said that nobody's hands are clean, Mr. Liebovitz wrote wrote "Nah, man. Not all of us are complicit. It's just you. It's you, because you're the one who gave that stentorian speech about red lines in Syria and then sat by and did nothing as those red lines were crossed and Assad continued to slaughter his own people, allowing the Iranians and the Russians to creep in and fill the vacuum left by your devastating lack of leadership." In short, Mr. Liebovitz isn't buying what Mr. Obama is peddling. Let's question Mr. Obama a
Read more