Is Tim Walz Kamala Harris's first major mistake?

Anyone that watched Monday night's rally in Philadelphia most likely thought that Josh Shapiro stole the show.  Monday night was supposed to be VP Harris's introduction of Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate. Instead, the rally turned into the 2028 coming out party for Josh Shapiro.

It's obvious that Kamala Harris was showing us who she really is or that she isn't a good judge of political talent. If she picked Little Timmy to keep the Dearborn Palestinians on her side, then she's an airhead strategist. Little Timmy won't add anything to the ticket. People are already figuring it out that he's a liar. Articles on Little Timmy's stolen valor are popping up.

One of the best analysts at MSNBC is Steve Kornacki. After the Walz pick, the Daily Caller reports "MSNBC data reporter Steve Kornacki said Tuesday that Democratic Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota may not be able to move the needle in key states as the party’s vice-presidential nominee."

Here's what Elizabeth Stauffer wrote for the Washington Examiner:

This week, Vice President Kamala Harris bowed to the radical pro-Hamas wing of the Democratic Party and tapped hard-left Gov. Tim Walz (D-MN) as her running mate, creating the most extreme presidential ticket in U.S. history.

Tremendously relieved that Harris passed over popular and comparably centrist Gov. Josh Shapiro (D-PA), former President Donald Trump responded with a simple message: “THANK YOU!”

Trump definitely dodged a bullet there. Shapiro is a legitimate centrist. Walz is a ligitimate huckster. I'd put Walz on a par with carnivale hucksters but I don't want to denigrate carnival hucksters. Check this out:

Thenn compare Little Timmy with Gov. Shapiro:

Shspiro had them in the palm of his hands. Walz had them wanting to go to get snacks. Finally, there's this: That's Little Timmy. He's all projection and all BS. I'm sure J.D. Vance is quaking in his boots. It's painfully obvious that Harris made a major mistake in picking Walz over Shapiro.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

Blistering Barack's butt (bigtime)

Image
This past weekend, Barack Obama tried spreading the blame around for Hamas's murderous rampage of Oct. 7. This blistering op-ed hints that Mr. Obama isn't the effective communicator that he once was. Obama initially insisted that "nobody's hands are clean" from the Oct. 7 Massacre. Liel Leibovitz, the Editor at large of Tablet Magazine wrote this op-ed questioning Obama's intellectual honesty. After Obama said that nobody's hands are clean, Mr. Liebovitz wrote wrote "Nah, man. Not all of us are complicit. It's just you. It's you, because you're the one who gave that stentorian speech about red lines in Syria and then sat by and did nothing as those red lines were crossed and Assad continued to slaughter his own people, allowing the Iranians and the Russians to creep in and fill the vacuum left by your devastating lack of leadership." In short, Mr. Liebovitz isn't buying what Mr. Obama is peddling. Let's question Mr. Obama a
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more