David Weiss must be terminated

Alan Dershowitz was quick to insist that David Weiss, the U.S. Attorney for Delaware and just named as the Special Counsel for the Hunter Biden investigation, wasn't a legitimate pick as Special Counsel. That isn't a controversial opinion anymore. He's got plenty of company who agree with him.

For instance, Andy McCarthy said right after the announcement that Weiss shouldn't have been picked. Just after the announcement, McCarthy said "This is a sham, there is no special counsel investigation and there is no Biden investigation. The special counsel regulations, what makes a special counsel special is that you are a lawyer who is brought in from outside the United States government. Not just outside the Justice Department, outside the government. This U.S. attorney is being appointed notwithstanding that he is an attorney who is a top official in the Biden Justice Department and Garland made clear is going to remain a top official in the Biden Justice Department."

Ed Morrissey's commentary is spot on:

This makes it more clear than ever that David Weiss should be removed as both special counsel in this case and as US Attorney in Delaware. Garland should resign for his own politically corrupt act in making Weiss special counsel in violation of the statute governing those appointments, an obvious attempt to cover up what the New York Times is exposing today. And if they won’t, well, the House has its first two targets for impeachment.
Garland is exposed as Biden's protector. Clearly, he wants as many potential counts to expire as possible. I'm betting that Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler would willingly testify that their legitimate investigations were impeded by the DOJ since they've already testified to that before Congress:

In Mr. Ziegler's testimony, he said that Weiss had been "hamstrung by the DOJ." Meanwhile, Mr. Shapley testified that he was in a meeting with Weiss where Weiss said he wasn't the final decisionmaker on who to investigate or prosecute:

When Mr. Shapley mentions Oct. 7,2022, that's a reference to the meeting when Weiss told the supervisors he didn't have the authority to make the final decision. Later, Mr. Weiss insisted that he had all the authority he needed in a letter to Sen. Lindsey Graham. Both statements can't be true. Since Weiss told a group of supervisory agents that he didn't have the authority, I'm inclined to think that's the truth. His statement to Sen. Graham sounds like a CYA statement.

Since AG Garland broke the law and because he's lied to Congress, he should be forced to resign or be terminated. Since Weiss has lied to Congress and has impeded the Hunter Biden/Joe Biden investigation, he should be terminated immediately. There's no justification for actions. There's no justification for his lack of profeessionalism. There's especially no justification for him not prosecuting Hunter on felony tax evasion charges.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more