Elon Musk's Twitter reinstatements

Elon Musk's restoration of Donald Trump's Twitter account is getting tons of attention this weekend. I wish the media cared about Twitter's previous activities that weren't as high in profile. The first question I'd ask Twitter's previous regime is why Twitter banned the Babylon Bee. The next question I'd ask is why Twitter banned Kayleigh McEnany.

I know the reasons why Twitter banned them, at least their public statements on these bannings. I'd just like the opportunity to ask them questions and get Twitter's former regime on the record. In the Babylon Bee's banning, Twitter's former regime explained "Twitter locked the account of a right-leaning parody site, The Babylon Bee, after it awarded Rachel Levine, the transgender Biden administration official, the title of 'man of the year.'" The Babylon Bee was given the opportunity to be restored if they repented and deleted that tweet.

Babylon Bee's CEO Seth Dillon said "he has no intention of doing so. We’re not deleting anything,' Dillon tweeted from his personal account. 'Truth is not hate speech. If the cost of telling the truth is the loss of our Twitter account, then so be it.'"

That's what courage looks like. This is why McEnany's account was suspended:

White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany on Wednesday was locked out of her personal Twitter account for sharing The Post’s bombshell cover story on Hunter Biden’s alleged hard drive and an email linking Joe Biden to his son’s job at a Ukrainian energy company.

"Your account has been locked," a message from the social media network informed McEnany, whose account has more than 1 million followers.

Thankfully, Kayleigh's account was unlocked awhile ago. Thankfully, Twitter's former regime permanently banned the Babylon Bee. That, in turn, triggered Elon to start looking into buying Twitter. I guess each dark cloud has a silver lining, huh? Thanks to Twitter's old regime, this is what we've been missing:

Anti-free speech Marxists can't win battles on merit. They've spent too much time cancelling opposing voices, causing their debating skills to atrophy terribly. The Democrats' best argument is 'Racist'. After that, lying is their next-best argument. Let's remember Obama's strawman arguments:

Thank the Washington Free Beacon for that montage. Typical of Obama's strawman arguments is when he said "there are those who say..." Who said that? It's never mentioned, like a Washington Post article citing "people close to the negotiations" or other anonymous-sourced BS.

Thank God for Elon Musk. He's restoring sanity to an insane hellscape known as Twitter.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more