How the DFL morphed into the NO Party

Anyone that's paid attention to this year's legislature has noticed that the House DFL morph into the NO PARTY! On bill after bill, on vote after vote, the vote for GOP bills is 67-67 on the final vote or 7-7 in committee. Walter Hudson's latest legislative update highlights the DFL's obstructionist habits perfectly. It opens by saying "This week, House Republicans attempted to advance three bills aimed at protecting safe and fair competition in girls sports. Simply declaring that biological males cannot play girls sports should not be controversial, but House Democrats went ahead and sided with the radicals by blocking all three bills."

Apparently, the DFL isn't interested in protecting teenage girls from teenage boys.

Parents, how much do you trust teenage boys using the same locker room or same bathroom with your teenage daughter? Let's put it differently. How many boys who identify as a girl are scamming the authorities to stare at young girls? Are you willing to risk that with YOUR DAUGHTER?

Most importantly, why did the DFL vote against Title IX protections? Before answering that question, view Walter Hudson's year-old dissertation on the subject:

Rep. Hudson made a brilliant point when he highlighted the fact that the DFL didn't attempt to refute his argument. As he said, the DFL just got emotional or walked out of the room. In Rep. Hudson's own words, his argument had aged well.
One of the proposals, the Preserving Girls Sports Act (H.F. 12), simply states that girls sports are for girls. Polling shows about 80 percent of the nation agrees with that notion. Yet by refusing to pass the bill, Democrats are keeping the door wide open for biological males to continue competing in girls sports.

What this issue really highlights is the importance of protecting the safety of girls and women. There are real, biological differences between males and females, no matter how much House Democrats try to ignore that reality.

Before voting, ask this question. Do teenage girls deserve to be protected from bigger, stronger, faster men? I've consistently answered that question in the affirmative. Most importantly, in 1972 when Democrats still thought straight, they joined together with Republicans to pass Title IX with strong bipartisan support. The bill was so solid, so noncontroversial, that TED KENNEDY AND JESSE HELMS voted for it.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Proof that Tim Walz doesn't care about fraud or other crime

Image
Anyone that thinks that Tim Walz, Minnesota's DFL governor, doesn't care about preventing crime or fraud hasn't read this article . Alpha News is reporting that "The Minnesota Department of Human Services (DHS) has confirmed that Dylan Adams, the fiscal policy analyst caught on video vandalizing Teslas in Minneapolis, is still employed by the state — meaning Minnesota taxpayers are footing the bill for his salary. In response to Alpha News inquiries, a DHS spokesperson said: "Dylan Adams is a current employee." Apparently, the Walz administration doesn't care that it's employing a vandal in its Department of Human Services. As for whether Adams "has faced consequences for racking up more than $21,000 in damage during work hours , the agency offered little transparency. 'No public data exists with respect to disciplinary action,' the spokesperson said." This reminds me of the old phrase I coined, which says 'It's impossible to...
Read more

Johnson family statement (unedited)

We are heartbroken beyond words by the tragic and senseless loss of our beloved daughter, Hallie Marie. Hallie was a bright light in our lives and in the lives of so many others. She was kind, compassionate, and full of promise. The pain of losing her in this way is something no family should ever have to endure, and we are still struggling to comprehend this unimaginable reality. We want to express our deepest gratitude to our family, friends, and even strangers for the overwhelming outpouring of love, prayers, and support. Your messages, tributes, and acts of kindness have brought us comfort and your prayers are sustaining us as we navigate this difficult journey. We are also thankful to law enforcement for their ongoing efforts. As we grieve and begin the difficult process of laying our daughter to rest, we respectfully ask for privacy from the media during this incredibly painful time. In the midst of this tragedy, we also want to acknowledge the importance of mental health suppor...
Read more

Tim Walz doubling down on Gestapo speech

Image
When Tim Walz, Minnesota's DFL governor, delivered the commencement address for the University of Minnesota Law school, he didn't deliver the typical commencement speech. He delivered a highly partisan speech instead. Gov. Walz compared "federal law enforcement agents implementing President Donald Trump’s immigration crackdown to a Nazi-era political police force." He called ICE agents Gestapo. Let's compare the 2. The Gestapo's mission was to rid Germany of Jews. To the Gestapo, it didn't matter that these Jews were German citizens and had been decades. Thanks to the Aryan Clauses, Jews were considered subhuman and weren't really Germans. That's an awfully racist viewpoint. Is Gov. Walz accusing law enforcement officers of being racists? I.C.E. I.C.E. agents enforce laws that bipartisan majorities in both houses of Congress have passed and that the president has signed. These immigration bills were negotiated between the 2 parties. The Aryan Clau...
Read more