Tim Walz's harsh introduction to Sunday morning programming

When I first saw the advertising that Tim Walz would be appearing on Fox News Sunday with Shannon Bream, I thought he'd get molested by the truth. Therefore, I'm not surprised that that's what happened. Next, he sat down for an interview with FNC's Shannon Bream. Unfortunately for the people, they llearned that he isn't a man of integrity. That's the diplomatic way of putting it.

National Review has a nice article that recaps many of Gov. Walz's misspeaks. For instance, Bream pressed Gov. Walz "on those programs and his justification for giving taxpayer-funded benefits to illegal immigrants. 'Are those not magnets to draw people here, many times on dangerous journeys for themselves, and why should your taxpayers in Minnesota or across the states pay for those programs?' Bream asked."

Gov. Walz replied "Well that’s not the vice president’s position. Minnesota ranks as a top five business state. We rank as a top three state for children-living and we’re the top state for health care access. I would also add this: we also have some of the safest roads."

What's omitted from Gov. Walz's statement is that the DFL spent the entire projected $18,000,000,000 budget, then raised taxes by another $9,000,000,000. After that, Gov. Walz broke his promise to deliver $2,000 Walz Checks to Minnesotans. Instead, the DFL legislature passed a bill sending $260 Walz Checks to eligible Minnesotans.

This is the entire interview:

This is the part of the interview where Gov. Walz insisted Minnesota hadn't repealed the Minnesota Statute requiring the doctor to do everything possible to save a baby's life who had survived an abortion:

As you've seen in the first video, Bream put the changes to the statute on the screen. The change was quite significant. Rep. Harry Niska explains the new statute: Harry knows because he offered the GOP amendment that would've codified Roe into Minneota's law. It's insanity to think that Gov. Tim Walz consistently tells the truth. He's been caught lying too often. I won't give hium the benefit of the doubt.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Blistering Barack's butt (bigtime)

Image
This past weekend, Barack Obama tried spreading the blame around for Hamas's murderous rampage of Oct. 7. This blistering op-ed hints that Mr. Obama isn't the effective communicator that he once was. Obama initially insisted that "nobody's hands are clean" from the Oct. 7 Massacre. Liel Leibovitz, the Editor at large of Tablet Magazine wrote this op-ed questioning Obama's intellectual honesty. After Obama said that nobody's hands are clean, Mr. Liebovitz wrote wrote "Nah, man. Not all of us are complicit. It's just you. It's you, because you're the one who gave that stentorian speech about red lines in Syria and then sat by and did nothing as those red lines were crossed and Assad continued to slaughter his own people, allowing the Iranians and the Russians to creep in and fill the vacuum left by your devastating lack of leadership." In short, Mr. Liebovitz isn't buying what Mr. Obama is peddling. Let's question Mr. Obama a
Read more