Fox News, Tucker Carlson part ways

In a surprising announcement this morning, Fox News announced that they were parting ways with Tucker Carlson. The announcement was made by Harris Faulkner during her program, which is named the Faulkner Focus. According to the announcement, "FOX News Media and Tucker Carlson have agreed to part ways, the network announced on Monday. 'We thank him for his service to the network as a host and prior to that as a contributor,' a FOX News Media spokesperson said in a statement. An interim program, 'Fox News Tonight,' will air at 8 p.m. ET until a permanent replacement for Carlson is named. 'Fox News Tonight' will be hosted by a rotation of various Fox News personalities."

While most of the articles covering Carlson's departure describe this as a huge loss for FNC, it'd be foolish not to mention that Carlson had some mighty big shoes to fill when he replaced Bill O'Reilly. The O'Reilly Factor was the top-rated show on cable news for 10+ years. That isn't to say that Carlson will be easily replace or that FNC will continue without missing a beat. That's living in La-La Land.

This is Faulkner's announcement:

If I had to guess, I'm betting on Lawrence Jones eventually succeeding Carlson. That's purely speculation on my part but it makes tons of sense. First, LJ is a rising star at FNC. They've been grooming him for something bigger since giving him his own show on Saturday nights. Next, he's a talented diversity hire, something that can't be said about Don Lemon. Lemon's appeal is limited at best. LJ's appeal is farther-reaching. Third, he has the talent to pull in a diverse audience. He's covered everything from crime, the Southern border, Chicago's downfall, various trials and other breaking news events.

It isn't a stretch to think this went into FNC's decision. Unlike liberals, FNC dooesn't jump without first having a back-up plan. LJ's promotion fits nicely, too, with FNC's new plan to promote talented minorities. Harris Faulkner was first. She's turned into a rock star. If LJ is the next minority hire, it'll be on the merits, not identity politics considerations. Meritocracy should always defeat identity politics.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more