Will Joe Biden let Ukraine defeat Russia?

There's nobody disputing the fact that Ukraine has exposed Russia's military as subpar for a supposed military superpower. Russia's troop morale is definitely subpar. Russia's supply lines are substandard and their equipment is mediocre at best.

Ukraine has had the heart of a lion from the start of Russia's invasion. When Joe Biden 'offered' to get President Zelenskiy out of Kyiv, President Zelenskiy replied "The fight is here; I need ammunition. I don't need a ride." It's insulting to President Zelensky to offer him the opportunity to thoroughly abandon his people.

Joe Biden assumed that Ukraine would collapse within a week. That didn't happen. He should've known better since Gen. Milley predicted it. This is the Gen. Milley who didn't see the rapid collapse of Afghanistan:

Top US General Mark Milley says he wasn’t aware of any intelligence reports indicating the Afghan military and government would collapse in just 11 days — despite claims officials had been warning for months of a quick Taliban takeover. During a press briefing on Wednesday, Milley said all intelligence reports regarding a Taliban threat "indicated multiple scenarios were possible."

"The timeframe of rapid collapse was widely estimated and ranged from weeks to months and even years following our departure," he said. "There was nothing that I saw that indicated a collapse of this army and this government in 11 days."

But I digress. The point is that Biden is a) thoroughly risk-averse and b) intimidated by Putin. Each of his major decisions on Ukraine has been prefaced by his worry of not provoking Putin. Antony Blinken, Biden's Secretary of State, greenlighted the transfer of MiGs to Ukraine. Then Putin spoke with Biden. Suddenly, the MiGs were off the table. The excuse given was that the Pentagon decided that Ukraine didn't need the MiGs.

Initial reports said that Ukraine's troops were besting the Russian troops. AFter last week's attack on a Russian oil depot, it's raising questions of whether Ukraine's air force isn't better than Russia's air force. If that's the case, why shouldn't NATO want Ukraine to defeat Russia before Russia has the opportunity to attack NATO? This is a typical Milley prediction:

Instead of relying on Gen. Milley, perhaps the Pentagon should rely on Tarot cards. Then again, perhaps we should find a different commander-in-chief. Unfortunately, that won't happen until 2025. By then, who knows if Ukraine will still exist?

It's time Joe Biden unleashed the dogs. It's time for him to do everything possible to tip this war in Ukraine's favor. Anything less would be un-American.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more