Elon Musk's coming out party is a success

People reading this article's headline are probably questioning the title because everyone knows who Elon Musk is. That's true in the sense that he's got worldwide name recognition. After Sean Hannity's interview of Trump and Musk, which aired Tuesday night, I'd argue that people finally saw Elon's personality fully displayed.

True Trump believers knew that Elon Musk sent Starlink communications units to Hurricane Helene-ravaged North Carolina. During Tuesday night's interview, they found out that Musk didn't charge the people or the government for those units. People also learned (from Pres. Trump) that those units saved lives by giving these North Carolinians a way to communicate their needs to the outside world. That was required because the Biden FEMA department didn't respond to the area's needs.

Early in Hannity's interview, Musk said "I think President Trump is a good man. He's been so unfairly attacked by the media. It's really outrageous. I've spent a lot of time with the president. Not once have I seen him do anything that's mean or cruel or wrong." It's worth noting that Hannity wasn't talking to Musk at the time. Check this out:

The interview also provided Musk with an additional platform to highlight the things his companies are working on. Here's part II of the interview:

Part III:

The thing that was most apparent last nightis that these men genuinely like each other. Next most apparent is that they aren't buying into the media's games. Finally, this might've been Hannity's best interview. He asked simple, direct and important questions, then got out of the way. It was effective, to say the least

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more

Has Sue Ek come face-to-face with DFL hijinks?

Image
Apparently, Minnesota state and county employees aren't that attentive to details. Last night, a frequent reader of this blog sent me a statement from House Speaker-designate Lisa Demuth, R-Cold Spring ." She issued the following statement regarding vote tabulation errors, malfunctions, and discrepancies that have taken place in Sherburne and Scott Counties: The errors and discrepancies we've seen this cycle are intolerable and unacceptable. A free and fair election demands sunlight on the process. These incidents fuel distrust and raise questions about the integrity and accuracy of election results. Without an opportunity to observe or respond Sherburne County added newly-found votes to the total. Just a day later, Scott County announced an unspecified "ballot distribution error" and "ballot scanning malfunction" that triggered an abrupt re-scan of more than 20,000 ballots. There was less than two hours notice between the public announcement and the be...
Read more