Joe Biden's open borders policies exposed as intentional

When it comes to the border, Bill Melugin is the best reporter out there. It isn't close, in fact. For years, Bill has been both clever in getting around Alejandro Mayorkas's stunts and impressive in knowing the U.S.'s immigration laws. For instance, most people think that unlawfully being in the U.S. isn't a criminal act. People think it's just a civil infraction.

According to Melugin's reporting, "crossing illegally is in fact, a crime. It is a misdemeanor under 8 USC 1325. And illegal re-entry after deportation is a felony, if prosecuted." During the 2020 Democrats' presidential debates, moderators asked the candidates if crossing the border without proper paperwork should be considered criminal or a civil infraction. Unanimously, Democrats voted in favor of civil infraction.

Considering the fact that Democrats didn't say a thing about the Biden Invasion, it's safe to say that Democrats don't care about enforcing immigration laws. I've said it before but I'll repeat it again. Democrats love passing laws. They just don't like enforcing existing laws.

Rest assured that the Biden administration hated Bill Melugin's reporting. Guy Benson explains why in this interview:

For 4 years, Democrats insisted that the border was shut. That's been exposed by the Trump administration. Our man Bill Melugin was on the scene of the Trump administration's raid in Boston:

The Biden administration could've arrested these people at any time. They chose not to arrest them. Now the Trump administration is picking these thugs up like a farmer bailing hay. People have noticed the difference in safety. The difference between administrations is dramatic.

People want safe neighborhoods. They didn't get that with the Biden administration. They're getting it in spades with the Trump administration. Check this out:

And this: And finally this:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more

Has Sue Ek come face-to-face with DFL hijinks?

Image
Apparently, Minnesota state and county employees aren't that attentive to details. Last night, a frequent reader of this blog sent me a statement from House Speaker-designate Lisa Demuth, R-Cold Spring ." She issued the following statement regarding vote tabulation errors, malfunctions, and discrepancies that have taken place in Sherburne and Scott Counties: The errors and discrepancies we've seen this cycle are intolerable and unacceptable. A free and fair election demands sunlight on the process. These incidents fuel distrust and raise questions about the integrity and accuracy of election results. Without an opportunity to observe or respond Sherburne County added newly-found votes to the total. Just a day later, Scott County announced an unspecified "ballot distribution error" and "ballot scanning malfunction" that triggered an abrupt re-scan of more than 20,000 ballots. There was less than two hours notice between the public announcement and the be...
Read more