Tom Homan meets with NYC Mayor Eric Adams

When Trump Border Czar Tom Homan met with NYC Mayor Eric Adams, a little bipartisanship was apparently kindled. That might lead to less confrontation on the mass deportation front. Then again, it doesn't appear as though bipartisanship is on Chicago's Democrat mayor's menu. Brandon Johnson is still insisting that he's vehemently opposed to anything with President-Elect Trump's name attached to it. First, let's examine what happened during Homan's meeting with Mayor Adams.

ABCNews is reporting "New York City Mayor Eric Adams met with incoming border czar Thomas Homan to discuss their plans to remove what he says were violent undocumented immigrants." The fact that Mayor Adams is calling it their plan might signal a thawing in their relationship. They likely don't see eye-to-eye on everything related to immigration but it's a nice first step. As Homan often says, 'why wouldn't a mayor want to get criminal aliens out of his city?' That's a fair point.

Chicago Alderman Raymond Lopez appeared with Homan when Homan announced that Chicago would be "Ground Zero" for mass deportations. In his remarks, Alderman Lopez said "Homan stated they may wind up getting some of the long-term undocumented who are doing right in our city, following the laws, but nonetheless, will have to be taken. That’s something that we desperately want to avoid happening and focus solely on removing those criminals committing those acts once they are here."

It isn't surprising that Public Advocate Williams was outside Gracie Mansion to advocate for more violence:

Meanwhile, Gov. J.B. Pritzker, (D-IL), is acting like Mr. Tough Guy:

The Illinois outcome is predictable. Gov. Pritzker will talk tough prior to meeting with Homan. After Homan tells him again that he'll prosecute Gov. Pritzker if he tries preventing ICE from deporting illegal immigrants, Gov. Pritzker will say publicly that he's gotten assuramces from Homan that he isn't here to pick up asylum-seekers. Then Gov. Pritzker will say that he's still going to keep an eye on ICE to make sure Homan keeps his word. Privately, Gov. Pritzker will rejoice that Homan has gotten rid of those criminals and national security threats.

Why wouldn't he? He just got rid of a ton of humanity that's costing his city hundreds of millions of dollars in education dollars, health care dollars and other public services dolllars.

As for Adams, he's playing it cool. He's getting along with the new face of law-and-order in the city. With any luck, he'll get re-elected while Alvin Bragg gets defeated. He wins re-election while getting rid of his biggest pain in his backside.

People have been saying that there's a new sheriff in town. I wish they'd stop saying that. I'd prefer they said that we're finally getting a sheriff in town. Jan. 20,2025 can't get here fast enough.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more