Joining the Joe Biden/Kamala Harris/Tim Walz blame game

Apparently, John Kennedy's saying isn't always true. I'm talking about JFK's saying from his Bay of Pigs failure. That's when he told a reporter that "victory has 100 fathers and defeat is an orphan." It isn't surprising that the exception to JFK's statement is when Joe Biden got together with Kamala Harris and Tim Walz in an effort to win a presidential election. Make no mistake about this. Harris's defeat belongs to all 3 of these Democrats.

Joe Biden's failure

This wouldn't have quickly turned into a failure if not for Biden's Afghanistan failure, 9.1% inflation in July, 2022, and gas that shot up to a national average of $5.01 a gallon in July, 2022. President-Elect Trump frequently says that inflation wrecks economies. In this instance, that's definitely true. That means this is Biden's failure, at least partially. The blame isn't entirely his, though.

Kamala Harris's failure

Without Harris casting the tie-breaking vote on the American Rescue plan while the economy was recovering nicely, we wouldn't have gotten to 9.1% inflation. Without that, Biden wouldn't have looked like an economic illiterate. That's when the American people realized that Biden was a stubborn-minded economic illiterate. That accelerated the loss of confidence in the Biden-Harris administration. The blame doesn't end there, though.

Tim Walz's failure

When Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and the American people saw Biden's meltdown at the June 27th debate, Democrats started panicking. The Democrat establishment went into full panic mode. Eventually, the Democrat Establishment pushed Biden out of his re-election bid. When Biden endorsed Harris to be the nominee, that created an opening on the ticket with Kamala at the top of the ticket. The logical choice would've been to pick Josh Shapiro as her running mate.

The governor of the biggest battleground state, Shapiro surely would've delivered Pennsylvania. That alone would've been reason enough to pick him as her running mate. Harris was too worried about picking a Jewish man, though. She was worried about placating the Palestinian Muslims in Michigan. Harris needed to win both states. By picking Minnesota's DFL governor Tim Walz, Harris guaranteed that she'd win Minnesota, a state that last went for a Republican in 1972.

At the end of this interview, John Fund said that Tim Walz returned to Minnesota defeated, where his home county voted against him and where he'll become a trivia question within 6 years:

Tim Walz didn't add anything to the ticket. Period. He'll replace Alan Eagleton as the worst running mate pick in U.S. history. When people study the Harris-Walz ticket, the biggest lesson they'll learn is that this duo would be a perfect fit for the political version of Dumb and Dumber:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more