Kamala Harris doesn't pass the Commander-in-Chief test

After the midterm elections, potential presidential candidates start stepping forward in hopes of raising their profile, getting an ambassador's job or cabinet position. Some are legitimately serious about winning the White House. Those that get serious consideration for the position of Leader of the Free World pass an informal test that I've called 'the Commander-in-Chief-Test' since the 1980s. Ronald Reagan passed the test with flying colors. George H.W. Bush passed it, too. Walter Mondale passed it, too, though not the way that Reagan passed it.

Obama passed this test from a managerial standpoint. From a belief standpoint, he didn't pass the test. Joe Biden could pass it for minutes at a time by faking it. I'll put this as diplomatically as possible. VP Kamala Harris will never pass the Commander-in-Chief-Test. VP Harris should feel happy, though. She consistently passes the Lighter-Than-Air-Test. Nobody will deny that Harris's thoughts aren't lighter than air. J.D. Vance's thoughts on Harris's intellectual heft are more diplomatically stated:

"Every time she does [an interview], I think we pick up 100,000 votes," quipped during a rally on Saturday in Leesport, Pa., when asked about Harris avoiding media interviews.
According to Harris in her interview with Oprah, to be American is to be a liberal Democrat:

According to Harris, to be American is to "love our country". According to Harris, to be American is to "take pride in the privilege of being American." At another point, it's suggested that 'some people' think it's wrong to be gay. The person suggesting that is VP Harris, whose campaign slogan is 'we're not going back. Apparently, Harris has already made that trip back. At minimum, she's falsely accusing others of holding those antiquated views.

Simply put, VP Harris is a lightweight intellectually and a fraud. Picturing her negotiating with Putin on Xi is frightening. Voting for her irresponsible.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more