Introducing Tim Walz and Kamala Harris, infanticide edition

During the ABC Presidential Debate, moderator/co-debater Linsey Davis insisted that "There is no state in this country where it is legal to kill a baby after it’s born.” Ms. Davis should've done a better job researching the subject. Students for Life Action has started running this ad which makes specific accusations about Minnesota:

SFLA's ad states the opposite:

In the opening frame, it says "As Governor, Tim Walz signed legislation REMOVING the requirement that babies born alive after botched abortions receive medical care."

In the second frame, it continues, saying "During his tenure, at least eight babies were born alive during abortions, and died gasping for air." That sounds like proof contradicting Ms. Davis.There's additional proof of this happening. On the final Saturday in the 2023 budget session, after the conference committee report had been agreed to for the HHS Omnibus Bill, Tina Liebling slipped a provision into the omnibus bill repealing Minnesota's version of the Born Alive Infant Protection Act.

Daniel Patrick Moynihan- Partial Birth Abortion

When Rick Santorum introduced a bill banning a procedure called Partial Birth Abortion, Daniel Partick Moynihan, a staunchly pro-choice Democrat, voted against it. The second time it was introduced, Sen. Moynihan voted for the bill. During the debate, Sen. Moynihan said "It is as close to infanticide as anything I have come upon." The definition of infanticideis "the act of killing an infant." Depriving a new-born baby of care when it's outside the womb fits that description. May Tim Walz rot in Hell for this.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more