Will Joe Biden be an historic president?

With Democrats worried sick about a possible wave election, there's another question creeping into the conversation. Back in March 2021, Biden invited some presidential historians into the White House for a conversation about what type of goals he should set for his presidency. They urged him to set his goals high. They urged him to think in terms of trying to be the next FDR or LBJ. As Biden's presidency circles the drain, Democrats like Pelosi and Obama plot against Biden. Meanwhile, support for Biden has virtually disappeared.

These are definitely difficult times for Democrats. Do they blow up democracy to avoid annihilation this November? Do they nuke the presidency of their incumbent president? Then again, what's the big deal? Democrats prevented Robert Kennedy Jr. from gaining access to the ballot. Democrats then made sure that Dean Phillips didn't stand a chance.Karma's a Bitch

Because Democrats ran the most undemocratic primary since 2016 and 2020, the less-than-democratic Democrats are stuck with a standardbearer who's tried shaking hands with the air and who told reporters that he'd talked with French President Mitterand at last year's G-7 meeting. Mitterrand died before the start of this century. Meanwhile, Biden is travelling the nation saying that he won the nomination fair and square (more or less):

Then there's the part where Biden talks about the threat to democracy Trump is:

The key date to keep in mind is August 7. That's the date by which Democrats have to have a nominee. If they haven't picked a nominee by the 7th, they won't have someone on the Ohio ballot. Think of how historic that would be.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more