Joe Biden out, Kamala Harris in; a sideways swap?

Now that Kamala Harris has enough delegates to become the Democrats' presidential nominee, it's time to figure out if Democrats are better off today. Thankfully, Mark Penn and Andrew Stein have written this op-ed on the subject. To say that their op-ed isn't filled with compliments is understatement. Stein and Penn open their op-ed by saying "Joe Biden has done the right thing at perhaps the wrong time, paving the way for Vice President Kamala Harris, but don’t expect any wholesale changes in the dynamics of the presidential race.

After that, Penn and Stein open both barrels, saying "Mr. Biden should never have run at all, and it is a tribute to the power of the Democratic machine that he advanced as far as he did. Absent the loony idea to have a 90-minute debate before he formally secured the nomination, he likely would have cruised onto the ballot and been kept under wraps until October."

Then they dropped the hammer on Harris:

Had he withdrawn a year ago, when he should have, there would have been a full primary process and an election, not a selection as we have here. The result of that process would likely have been a Harris nomination. The last four Democratic vice presidents—Hubert Humphrey, Walter Mondale, Al Gore and Mr. Biden—all became presidential nominees, though only Mr. Biden won.
This is the key sentence:
there would have been a full primary process and an election, not a selection as we have here.
Obama and Soros hate free and fair elections. Manipulation is their preference. Getting empty vessels selected into positions of authority is another of their preferences. When Joe Biden picked Kamala Harris to be his running mate, it's likely that he picked her for her ethnicity, gender and her love of criminals:

She even called BLM "brilliant":

I can think of lots of adjectives to use in conjunction with BLM but brilliant isn't one of them. FINAL QUESTION: would rank-and-file Democrats pick VP Harris as their presidential nominee if they knew she praised sex offenders (Jacob Blake) and racist organizations (BLM)?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more