With Hunter Biden's trial, the facts aren't important

According to Bill McGurn's latest column, evidence and truth aren't that important. He wrote "The two cases have one crucial fact in common. The law and the truth are incidental. They are important only for the Biden family story lines each case represents." Hunter's laptop, the one that 51 former top spies "has the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation", was introduced into evidence in Hunter's trial by an FBI agent. The FBI agent verified that the contents weren't tampered with and it was Hunter's laptop.

As this article states, "the 51 former 'intelligence' officials who cast doubt on The Post’s Hunter Biden laptop stories in a public letter really were just desperate to get Joe Biden elected president. And more than a year later, even after their Deep State sabotage has been shown again and again to be a lie, they refuse to own up to how they undermined an election."

That article led to this famous NY Post front page:

This interview shows how slippery CIA agents are:

Later in the article, McGurn wrote this:
"Look, there are 50 former national intelligence folks who said that what this, he’s accusing me of, is a Russian plant," Mr. Biden said. "They have said that this has all the characteristics—four, five former heads of the CIA, both parties, say what he’s saying is a bunch of garbage. Nobody believes it except him and his good friend Rudy Giuliani."

Not quite. As it turns out, the Biden Justice Department believes it too. Since the last election, we’ve learned from testimony by former CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell that the intelligence officials’ statement was done at Antony Blinken’s impetus to "help Vice President Biden." Mr. Blinken was then senior adviser to the Biden campaign. He is now secretary of state.

I believed Miranda Devine's investigative reporting immediately because her investigative reporting over the years has been impeccable. I'd put her up there with John Solomon, Sara Carter and Gregg Jarrett in terms of investigative reporters.

The (Biden) fix is in. Joe can't call Trump a felon, then have Trump call Hunter a felon, too. The difference is that Trump's 'conviction' will be overturned on appeal. Hunter's conviction won't be overturned. Hunter's conviction would only be erased by Daddy's pardon.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

Blistering Barack's butt (bigtime)

Image
This past weekend, Barack Obama tried spreading the blame around for Hamas's murderous rampage of Oct. 7. This blistering op-ed hints that Mr. Obama isn't the effective communicator that he once was. Obama initially insisted that "nobody's hands are clean" from the Oct. 7 Massacre. Liel Leibovitz, the Editor at large of Tablet Magazine wrote this op-ed questioning Obama's intellectual honesty. After Obama said that nobody's hands are clean, Mr. Liebovitz wrote wrote "Nah, man. Not all of us are complicit. It's just you. It's you, because you're the one who gave that stentorian speech about red lines in Syria and then sat by and did nothing as those red lines were crossed and Assad continued to slaughter his own people, allowing the Iranians and the Russians to creep in and fill the vacuum left by your devastating lack of leadership." In short, Mr. Liebovitz isn't buying what Mr. Obama is peddling. Let's question Mr. Obama a
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more