Will Joe Biden have to cheat to win re-election, Chicago edition?

Is Joe Biden about to experience a new part to his open borders crisis? If that answer is yes, then the new HQ will likely be 'built' in Chicago, IL. Right now, this articlehints that winds of change might halt the Democrats' reign of supremacy over Chicago.

The article opens by saying "Chicago residents expressed frustration and anger with President Biden ahead of his visit to the city, warning that Black voters are turning on the Democratic Party in huge numbers. P-Rae Easley and Betty Guider joined 'Fox & Friends First' Wednesday to explain why they think the city is no longer 'the Democratic stronghold that they anticipated.'" It isn't wise to ignore these people's worries.

The people's biggest worries

According to the article, the people's worries aren't just complaints. They're legitimate worries. Part of the people's worries have to do with the city's (and the administration's) mishandling of border security:

"The city is completely fed up with the Democratic Party. We are stepping over illegals every day. They are now trying to break into people's homes. Gas is through the roof, groceries are through the roof, violence is up. Nothing is comfortable here under Democratic leadership. We're all moving on," said Easley.
Ms. Easley is quite the advocate for Mr. Trump. Enjoy:

That's cute. Hearing P-Rae call Biden "Jim Crow Joe" is hilarious. Biden's history of support for segregation helps the title stick. Despite the fact that blacks are turning away from the Democrats, it's still fact that Democrats won't hesitate in manufacturing the votes. A loyal reader of this blog with deep ties to Chicaago told me that Chicago is still the vote-manufacturing capitol of the U.S. This reader argued that Chicago is different than Philadelphia, where they simply buy votes with "walking around money." That's a fair point. Buying votes is different than manufacturing votes on a home printing press. This is noteworthy:
Easley thinks more voters are going to vote for Trump despite Biden winning the city in 2020 by a landslide. She said the situation is changing quickly because of Democrats' policies on migrants.

"I think that they're definitely going to vote for Donald Trump, because we can't afford to keep subsidizing the illegals who are coming here. … People are proudly stating that they're going to vote for the first time in their lives, and they're going to run to the polls to vote for Donald John Trump," she added.

I'll still put Illinois in the 'I'll believe it when I see it' category. Still, things are changing in Chicago and NYC. This time, I won't buy it if Jim Crow Joe wins. In 2020, Biden led in all the national polls. This time, he isn't leading in any national polls. For that matter, Trump is leading consistently in swing state polls, too. That doesn't equate into an electoral college victory for the sitting president. Period.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more