Verdict is in: Joe Biden's "ironclad support" for Israel doesn't exist

Joe Biden has frequently said that his administration's support for Israel is "ironclad." That verdict is now in on that. That verdict is this: Joe Biden is full of it. In fact, this article provides proof that Biden's claim of ironclad U.S. support doesn't have anything to do with the truth.

The article opens by saying "President Joe Biden said Wednesday that he would not supply offensive weapons that Israel could use to launch an all-out assault on Rafah, the last major Hamas stronghold in Gaza, over concern for the well-being of the more than 1 million civilians sheltering there." Since Israel became a nation again in 1948, the U.S. has stood fast with Israel. This is the biggest U.S. betrayal of Israel since 1948.

Biden administration is worst ally of Israel

That means that the Biden administration has the worst track record on Israel in U.S. history. That's just the start of it. The article continues:

Biden, in an interview with CNN, said the U.S. was still committed to Israel's defense and would supply Iron Dome rocket interceptors and other defensive arms, but that if Israel goes into Rafah, "we’re not going to supply the weapons and artillery shells used."
In other words, Biden is responsible for causing another forever war. While it's true that this was was started by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, it's equally true that this war would be almost over had Biden supplied Israel with the preciion-guided bombs and other munitions that are effective in killing terrorists while limiting civilian damage. This report explains what's at play in this decision:

It says "Student protests across college campuses have increased pressure on the White House to take action against Israel."

This is proof that Joe Biden doesn't have the spine to tell these terrorist sympathizers and proefessional agitators that Congress, not the agitators, sets U.S. foreign policy.

Further, Alan Dershowitz is teaming with other attorneys to file lawsuits against the agitators:

I hope Dershowitz and his team pile pain on these punks. They deserve it almost as much as Biden deserves it. I hope these lawsuits put these punks in pain for the next 20+ years. Above all, I hope Biden gets his backside handed to him in November.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Blistering Barack's butt (bigtime)

Image
This past weekend, Barack Obama tried spreading the blame around for Hamas's murderous rampage of Oct. 7. This blistering op-ed hints that Mr. Obama isn't the effective communicator that he once was. Obama initially insisted that "nobody's hands are clean" from the Oct. 7 Massacre. Liel Leibovitz, the Editor at large of Tablet Magazine wrote this op-ed questioning Obama's intellectual honesty. After Obama said that nobody's hands are clean, Mr. Liebovitz wrote wrote "Nah, man. Not all of us are complicit. It's just you. It's you, because you're the one who gave that stentorian speech about red lines in Syria and then sat by and did nothing as those red lines were crossed and Assad continued to slaughter his own people, allowing the Iranians and the Russians to creep in and fill the vacuum left by your devastating lack of leadership." In short, Mr. Liebovitz isn't buying what Mr. Obama is peddling. Let's question Mr. Obama a
Read more