Robert DeNiro, Joe Biden: a pair of unwell 80-somethings

Until Tuesday, the Biden campaign wisely stayed quiet on Trump's trial. Yesterday, they foolishly stepped off the proverbial bench. It was bad enough that they said anything about the trial. What made things infinitely worse is that the campaign hired a washed-up actor with a bitter streak a mile wide to attack Trump. It wasn't a pretty sight:

Get that man his meds. He's having hallucinations or something.

Philip Wegmann wrote:

Outside the Manhattan courtroom where the former president was on trial, at a press conference organized by the Biden-Harris campaign, actor Robert De Niro rhetorically ran ahead of Biden, making his dire warning about the future of representative government explicit.

"Under Trump," the celebrity surrogate said that the government Abraham Lincoln described as of, for, and by the people "will perish from the earth." The rights secured by those the nation recently remembered on Memorial Day, the actor added, well, "you can kiss these freedoms goodbye. And elections – forget about it. That’s over, that’s done," he insisted. "If he gets in, I can tell you right now, he will never leave."

DeNiro is proof that a little paranoia goes a L-O-O-O-N-G way. Either DeNiro is ultra-paranoid or he's as dishonest as Biden. Both thoughts are frightening.

Then there's Joe Biden's Philadelphia 'rally':

Check out the 'crowd':
Joe really knows how to fill the building. NOT!

Elections are about the future

Joe Biden and Robert DeNiro represent the past. They don't represent anything that people aspire to. Trump is 77-years-old but he's getting out to NASCAR events, MMA fights and mixing with people. Joe Biden visits high schools and union halls. Trump holds rallies in 'enemy territory' like in the Bronx, where he gets cheered enthusiastically by minority voters.

The difference couldn't be more evident!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more