Joe Biden, the heart of the Democrats' lawfare problems

This past week, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg's case all-but-completely came off the rails. Stormy Daniels' overly vivid testimony almost caused a mistrial in NY v. Trump. Earlier in the week, Judge Aileen Cannon indefinitely postponed the Mar-a-Lago trial, in which Trump is accused of "improperly handling classified documents." The delay is partially required because Special Counsel Jack Smith admitted in court pleadings that he'd mishandled classified documents.

Simply put, the Democrats' lawfare strategy is falling apart at the seams. What isn't getting talked about is why the Democrats chose to deploy this strategy. That's what happens when the Democrats' president isn't qualified for the job.

The Heart of the Democrats' Lawfare Strategy

Let's be clear about this. Democrats wouldn't need to opt for this strategy if they'd opted for a legitimate candidate instead of sticking with Biden. These days, Biden has been a mental puddle of his former self. Kimberley Strassel’s article highlights the Democrats’ difficulties in detail:

Mr. Smith’s indictments in the District of Columbia, alleging that Mr. Trump plotted to overturn the 2020 election, have separately gone to the Supreme Court, where the justices are determining whether and when a former president is immune from criminal prosecution for acts while in office. A decision on the legal question is expected in June, whereupon the case will likely return to the lower courts to apply it to the facts. That may also mean no trial before the election.
The questioning by the justices during oral arguments strongly suggest that presidents have immunity from prosecution, though not total immunity. The thought is that the Supreme Court would send the case back to the trial court to determine the findings of facts before making a final ruling.

As for the 'Hush Money Trial', Stormy Daniels' testimony went off the rails with illicit sexual details:

Ms. Strassel is right in this paragraph:
Which leaves the lawfare crowd’s last, best hope in Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s muddled charges on that Trump 2016 “hush money” deal with adult-film star Stormy Daniels. That case was a mess well before Judge Juan Merchan allowed Ms. Daniels to provide the jury Kama-Sutra-worthy descriptions of her claimed sexual tryst with Mr. Trump, during which she intimated several times that the encounter was nonconsensual.
These trials are coming off the rails, mostly because the Democrat-appointed prosecutors let their ideology get the better of them. In Manhattan, the prosecution hasn't come close to presenting evidence of a criminal act. They've presented testimony of alleged tawdry behavior. That isn't evidence of a crime, though.

None of this would've been needed if Joe Biden wasn't such a terrible candidate with a terrible record to run on. He deserves getting defeated.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more