Joe Biden's Iran lid highlights Biden's missing leadership

After Joe Biden spoke via phone with Israeli PM Netanyahu, to "condemn Iran's attacks in the strongest possible terms and reaffirm America’s ironclad commitment to the security of Israel." Attached to Biden's official tweet was Biden's' official statement.

In Biden's official statement, one of his senior staffers wrote that "Iran launched an unprecedented air attack against military facilities in Israel." Biden then said that he "condemned the attacks in the strongest terms possible." Check out Biden's statement and tweet:

Notice that the statement is a JPEG photo, not a document. Further, notice that the White House's briefing room page is missing something:
Fox News' Jacqui Heinrich filed this report on Iran's attack against Israel:

There's a statement about the call but there isn't a readout for the conversation. That's rather odd. Further, it's odd that RedState's Nick Arama initially wrote Joe Biden would be speaking after Iran began its attack on Israel. Later, Biden's staff said that "Biden was not doing it and indeed calling an early lid."

That's beyond odd. On the night when Iran attacked Israel for the first time in history, Joe Biden calls a lid on White House press activities without delivering a speech from the Oval Office.

Was Biden incapable of delivering such a speech? Was it that he was simply too tired to deliver a speech? In 2008, Hillary Clinton ran an ad that talked about who would answer a call from somewhere overseas at 3:00 am. These days, I'm questioning if Joe would be napping at 3:00 pm. It isn't at all clear that he'd be awake in the middle of the night.

Leadership isn't Joe's strength.

Joe Biden's strength is napping. Whether it's morning napping, afternoon napping or going to bed early, this president has a talent for not being around when he's needed. That's Biden's strength and legacy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more