Highlighting the Biden Doctrine's principles

There's finally a definition for the Biden Doctrine. It isn't easy to define because he's a total scatterbrain. This past Saturday, Biden said that his administration's relationship with Israel was "ironclad." Then Biden told Israeli PM Netanyahu that "the United States would not support an Israeli counterattack against Iran." Apparently, that's the Biden Doctrine. The Biden Doctrine apparently means that the U.S. will help nations that get attacked by state sponsors of terrorism or hostile expansionist regimes defend themselves but it won't let the attacked nations defeat the nation that initially attacked. With Biden as Wimp-in-Chief, the best an attacked nation can hope for is lengthy draw that takes years to accomplish.

Ukraine is a perfect example of that. Russia attacked Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. That war is still ongoing with victory nowhere in sight for either nation. Don't you just love these 20-years wars? When Hamas attacked Israel during a cease-fire, Biden insisted (undoubtedly with a wink-and-nod) that Israel could count on the U.S. Now that Iran has launched over 300 missiles, rockets and drones at Israel from Iran, the U.S. isn't interested in helping defeat Iran, the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism.

Ben Rhodes thinks there will be a retaliation. He just isn't certain how big the retaliation will be:

Biden reportedly told the prime minister that the U.S. would not participate in nor support an Israeli military response to Iran’s attack. Biden and top White House officials are concerned that escalating military action between Israel and Iran could have significant consequences for the region.

"You got a win. Take the win," Biden told Netanyahu, according to a White House official who spoke with Axios.

Doing nothing after Iran attacks is appeasement. Put all the lipstick on that pig you want but it's still a pig. Further, Alan Dershowitz is sending a message to Biden. Here's that message: The Biden Doctrine should be sent to the ash heap of history to live with the other worst ideas in history. It doesn't belong with worthwhile doctrines.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more