Another one bites the dust, Mayorkas impeachment edition

Wednesday afternoon, Chuck Schumer likely sent 3 (or more) Democrat senators to their electoral defeat when he made 51 Democrat senators vote in lockstep to not hold a trial based on the evidence House impeachment managers compiled during their investigation into Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas.

Sen. Schumer took to the Senate floor Wednesday and said that it wasn't a high crime or misdemeanor when Secretary Mayorkas intentionally and willingly ignored the properly enacted laws. He called it a policy dispute. That's world class spin. That isn't a policy dispute. In every city other than Washington, DC or NYC, that's called a crime.

Now that the trial has been improperly eliminated, it's time for John Q. Public to torment these senators for thumbing their nose at the Constitution. Sen. Schumer knows that Secretary Mayorkas and President Biden have frequently and intentionally rewritten immigration laws. Now that the trial has been disposed of, I hope groups of citizens organize protests against Jon Tester, Sherrod Brown and Ruben Gallegos for voting against conviction of Alejandro Mayorkas or the impeaching of Secretary Mayorkas.

I'm asking these citizens to obey the law while making these men's lives a living hell. When Maxine Waters told Democrats to make like life a living hell for Republicans, she didn't explain why other than because these cabinet officials were Republicans:

I'm asking for these senators to be criticized for not doing their jobs. Wednesday afternoon, these senators' job was to listen to the evidence collected during the House Homeland Security Committee's painstaking investigation, then render a verdict. Further, I want Sen. Schumer to be tormented daily for throwing this hissy fit:

Sen. Braun, (R-IN), summed things up perfectly in this statement:

It's time to throw these Democrat bums out this November. They voted in lockstep to say that cabinet secretaries could intentionally ignore properly enacted laws and face no consequences. Senate Democrats voted that lawlessness was acceptable. Senate Democrats voted yesterday that Secretary Mayorkas acted properly when Laken Riley's alleged murderer was released rather than captured after he was caught in New York for a felony before he moved to Georgia and allegedly murdered Miss Riley.

To Sen. Schumer: Hell hath no fury like the American people after a cheap politician ignores his responsibilities. This is a short-lived victory. Sen. Schumer and the Democrats will regret this stunt come November.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more