Where's Ronald Reagan when you really need him, Ukraine edition

It's often thought that Joe Biden and Donald Trump are opposites when it comes to Ukraine. Bill McGurn took the time to explain how they're similar in terms of Ukraine. He lays out the similarities in his latest column. (Where's Ronald Reagan when we really need him?)

In his column, McGurn wrote "The dominant narrative today holds that Joe Biden and Donald Trump are opposites on Ukraine. The president supports the Senate bill that includes about $60 billion for Kyiv, mostly in military aid. The former president attacks it, and his influence among House Republicans is why Speaker Mike Johnson is reluctant to bring it to the floor for a vote."

McGurn then wrote "But when it comes to the failure to spell out a strategic argument, the two are one. As a result, the military-aid package has largely been fought over issues unrelated to Ukraine, such as funding for border security. Meanwhile, Democrats sound like hawks, Republicans sound like doves, and U.S. policy slides into strategic incoherence."

Mike Johnson doesn't have much wiggle room on Ukraine aid. What makes things tricky is that he has a dovish presidential nominee who seems more interested in cutting deals with enemies than helping allies win:

Trump's argument is that Putin wouldn't have invaded Ukraine had he been president. While that's likely true, that's irrelevant at this point. Just like Reagan inherited a mess from Carter in 1981, Trump will inherit a mess if he wins this November. Should he be satisfied with negotiating a stalemate? Should he insist on defeating Putin's Russia?

There was a time when the U.S. enjoyed winning wars. While it's true that President Reagan negotiated with Gorbachev, he did that only until the Soviet Union collapsed. Let's be clear about this. Putin's Russia is definitely defeatable. I recall a briefing from the Pentagon where the briefing general said that the Russian T-72 tanks couldn't go offroad because the fields were too muddy in the spring. A military that can't get its tanks to maneuver offroad isn't a superpower. That's a totally defeatable military.

Add to that the fact that most of the soldiers that initially invaded Ukraine were conscripts with virtually no training. That isn't a superpower. That's a military that should've been disdpatched quickly. FYI- This is the type of leader you enthusiastically support:

"I don't need a ride. I need more ammunition." That's a battlecry to rally around. We need to help Ukraine defeat Putin's Russia. That way, we don't have to worry about them for the next 20+ years. That's the opposite of Biden's prposed 20-year war.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more