Was Feb. 8, 2024 the end of Joe Biden's campaign?

When Special Counsel Robert Hur's report dropped late Thursday, it all but officially ended Joe Biden's re-election campaign. First thing this morning, Joe Scarborough insisted that the headline should be "Not indicted." That's intentionally misleading. That's because the bombshell finding in the report is that Joe Biden "willfully retained and disclosed" classified information, which "risked serious damage to America’s national security."

The only reason he wasn't indicted? " According to James Bovard's article, Biden wasn't indicted because "Uncle Joe is little more than 'an elderly man with a poor memory,' according to the report." TRANSLATION: Biden's mind is mush. Last night, after the Hur Report dropped, Biden tried to prove that he's just fine for another term. It isn't a stretch to think that Thursday is the worst day in Biden's administration, worse than the day 13 American heroes were killed at Hamid Karzai Airport in Afghanistan. After the report was published, Biden tried saying what Scarborough thought he should say. Here's how that went:

For the first 4+ minutes, things went ok. Not great but ok. Then he hit his wall. Biden said that he called el-Sisi of Mexico. Next, he said "I'm of the view, as you know, that the conduct of the response in Gaza Strip has been ... um ... over the top. I think that ... uh ... as you know initially President el-Sisi of Mexico did not want to open up the gate..."

El-Sisi is Egypt's president, not Mexico's president. This is an angry man:

This is man who is in cognitive decline:

Francois Mitterand died in 1996. Biden's administration didn't start until Jan. 20, 2021. Biden just missed talking to President Mitterand by 25+ years. BTW, Biden was still a senator in 1996.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more