The Uniparty must die; so must omnibus bills

If we want accountability and good governance in Washington, DC, then it's imperative that we get rid of omnibus bills. Those types of bills are perfect for politicians that want to vote for unpopular provisions but still avoid accountability from voters. President Reagan once said that politics is the second-oldest profession and, "at times, it looks like the world's oldest profession."

By putting multiple 'must-pass' bills together, the Uniparty guarantees that whatever is in the bill, a major part of it will be pork. Then the Uniparty defends their creation by insisting that they didn't want to vote for the unpopular parts of the bill but there was too much important stuff in the bill to vote against.

What they're really saying is a) they created the bill, complete with all the crap in it, and b) they didn't have the spine to say no to excessive spending that we don't the money fore and that we don't need.

The Ukraine aid bill was thrown together behind closed doors, with 2 Democrats ganging up against the lone Republican, On top of that, the Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell all but told Jim Lankford that he'd pretty much have to settle for a watered-down border security bill because Ukraine aid is just too important. Sen. McConnell being the GOP leader of the Uniparty bought Biden's 'call of history' BS. In this tweet, Biden emphatically states 3 times "History is watching":

Message for Joe Biden:

The American people are watching. They see you ignoring the TX-Mex border. They see the rampant crime in our once-great cities of San Francisco, New York City and Chicago. They're sickened seeing things like this:

Joe Biden, Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer apparently care more about Ukraine aid than NYPD officers. That's the Uniparty way. Whatever happened to putting U.S. public safety first? It isn't that we don't care about Ukraine. It's that real Americans care about Texas and the NYPD more than Ukraine.

The Uniparty's priorities aren't America's priorities. The Uniparty's agenda is 'status quo all the way around' even when things are obviously broken.

The Uniparty had the perfect opportunity to fix the border security crisis. Instead of building the wall and fixing the asylum problem, the Uniparty produced a bill that was long on poison pills and short on fixing the problems. The American people rejected the omnibus bill in less than 24 hrs.

They're trying to reject the Ukraine aid bill, too. What the people are saying is that they want the U.S.-Mexico border fixed and they want Ukraine to kick Putin's ass back to Russia ASAP. Biden is giving us another forever war while Sen. McConnell is doing his best at keeping the border open.

That's why the Uniparty must go and why bills that don't go through their committees of jurisdiction, aka omnibus bills must be rejected by the American people.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more