Joe Biden's criticism of racism rings hollow

Joe Biden knows more than a little about segregationist senators. Early in his Senate career, he's worked with segregationist senators. For those of you who are wondering, that wasn't right after reconstruction. I'll be clear about this. Joe Biden is a full-blooded racist. It isn't difficult to find racist quotes from him. It's unfortunate that these statements aren't just things he said in the 1970s. We'll return to that subject in a bit.

Let's shift to today's Joe Biden. This week, Biden said "I've been a senator since '72. I've served with real racists. I've served with Strom Thurmond. I've served with all these guys that have set terrible records on race. But guess what? These guys are worse. These guys do not believe in basic democratic principles."

Joe Biden eulogized Sen. Byrd, the late former Exalted Cyclops of the KKK, at Sen. Byrd's funeral in 2010. Biden is most famous for chairing Clarence Thomas' confirmation hearings to the U.S. Supreme Court. Those hearings are famous but not in a good way. They're famous for this moment:

In light of that infamous moment from October 11, 1991, Joe Biden doesn't have a bit of standing to talk about racism. This interview explains why Joe Biden isn't credible on the topic of race:

BIDEN:"I believed Anita Hill. I voted against Clarence Thomas. When she decided to come forward, what I feel badly about is the inability to silence the Republican critics on the Committee." Biden then said that people wanted him to gavel down the people "who were harassing her."

Anita Hill testified that she kept changing jobs whenever Justice Thomas changed jobs. Why would a woman who's being harassed follow her harasser from agency to agency?

Think that Biden isn't a racist? Watch this, then let's talk:

Biden is a blowhard who can't be trusted. He's always been known as a candidate who talks a better game than he delivers. He's talked like he's a civil rights guy. What a bunch of BS.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more