Dan Goldman put in his place by Angel Mom Josephine Dunn

Since he joined Congress, Dan Goldman's chief responsibility has been to be the snottiest congressman in DC. Thursday, Rep. Goldman was at it again. This time, though, Angel Mom Josephine Dunn flattened him with her words. I'm making it my responsibility to humiliate Rep. Goldman, (D-NY).

Goldman opened by essentially telling Dunn that she was a GOP prop and that she wasn't smart enough to know what the definition of "high crimes and misdemeanors" was. What a lovely way to welcome her to the hearing.

Ian Sams, special assistant to Joe Biden, jumped into the fight, too, saying "Beyond the shameless partisanship of attempting to scapegoat a Cabinet secretary who is actively working to find solutions to a problem Congressional Republicans have spent years refusing to actually solve, this stunt by House Republicans is just the latest example of their blatant disregard for the Constitution and our democratic system of government." Sams is almost as devoid of integrity as Rep. Goldman. As for Sams saying that Mayorkas is being scapegoated because he's "working to find a solution to a problem Congressional Republicans have spent years refusing to actually solve", I'll just remind Sams of this instant classic of Mayorkas denying that a problem existed:

Democrats are devoid of people capable of telling the truth or acting withg integrity. Let's return to Goldman's stunt. Rep. Goldman said that Josephine Dunn was "being used as a fact witness in an impeachment." Then Rep. Goldman told Mrs. Dunn that Republicans have refused to spend money on a) increasing the number of Border Patrol agents and b) installing detectors to stop the flow of illegal immigrants. The thing is that increasing border patrol agents by 300 didn't work. The number of illegal crossings jumped from 2,350,000 in FY 2022 to 2,475,000 in FY2023.

That means spending money on Border Patrol agents didn't work. That's because the policy was wrong. Mrs. Dunn told Rep. Goldman that we didn't need more agents to make sandwiches and process illegal aliens and giving them permission to move anywhere in the U.S. Check this out:

Goldman was stunned when Mrs. Dunn said "I would like the Border Patrol to do the job they were hired to do. Every Border Patrol officer I have spoken to has told me that their hands are tied by this administration and Mr. Mayorkas." Rep. Goldman got hit with both barrels with that statement because he first said "I would assume, Ms. Dunn, that you would agree, would you not, that it would help to stop the fentanyl tradee and fentanyl trafficking from coming into this country if we had more law enforcement officers at the border and more resources and technology to stop the fentanyl from coming in? Would you agree with that?" Mrs. Dunn replied "I would disagree with that. Border Patrol is now being used to make sandwiches and to screen people and let them into our country."

Questions for Daniel Goldman

  1. Mr. Goldman, would you agree or disagree that this administration's policies have resulted in record numbers of illegal aliens into the U.S.?
  2. Mr. Goldman, why did Democrats reject the policies in the Republicans' H.R.2 bill?
  3. Mr. Goldman, isn't it safe to say that the Biden administration's border security policies have made conditions worse, not better, along the Tex-Mex Border?
  4. Mr. Goldman, why have Homeland Security Democrats refused to visit the Tex-Mex Border to conduct a fact-finding investigation?
Dan Goldman Democrats aren't interested in shutting the border. They're interested in faking interest enough in border security to get Democrats through the next election. If that means disrespecting people like Mrs. Dunn, that's what Democrats are willing to do.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more