Spain, France reject Joe Biden's leadership

During his first overseas trip, Joe Biden defiantly declared that "The U.S. is back." At that get-together, much was made of the back-slapping and glad-handing, etc. This Barrons article paints a quite different picture, though.

The Barrons article notes that "Spain's Socialist government said Friday it had still not decided whether it will take part in an international coalition led by the United States to quell Houthi attacks on ships transiting the Red Sea." France is considering whether it'll join the coalition, too. Perhaps Mr. Biden was a little premature with his declaration that the U.S. was back. Then, too, perhaps what Mr. Biden meant was that the U.S. was back to leading from behind and apologizing everywhere it went in the world.

Who can forget President Obama’s worldwide apology tour? He was a worldwide embarrassment to the U.S., the opposite of JFK or Reagan. Today’s Democrats apparently see strength as appalling. America's allies worldwide aren't confident in Biden's leadership. They'd be foolish participating in a U.S.-led military coalition. This report doesn't pull any punches:

Like most of Joe Biden's brash statements, this one's a pile of BS. Biden isn't trustworthy. Afghanistan taught the British and other NATO allies they can't trust Biden. It taught American Gold Star families they shouldn't trust him either:

Why should NATO nations trust Biden? I haven't seen proof that Biden takes this stuff seriously. Protecting the U.S. from foreign terrorists is one of Biden's biggest responsibilities as commander-in-chief. He's failed that responsibility.

Our enemies understand that Biden is a paper tiger, if that. Our allies think that he's capable of stabbing them in the back at any time. It isn't a stretch to think that Biden is the worst commander-in-chief of our lifetime.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more