Pro-Palestinian protestors block traffic at JFK, LAX airports

It isn't surprising that pro-Palestinian Democrat protestors blocked roads leading into JFK and LAX airports. As with other protests, the protestors proved that they're either exceptionally dishonest or that they haven't used a dictionary in decades. Fox Business is reporting that "protesters were seen on the road holding banners accusing Israel of committing genocide in the Gaza Strip amid Israel's military offensive against Hamas."

The Dictionary.com definition of genocide is "the deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group." What happened during the Holocaust fits the description of genocide. What Hamas wants to do to Israel fits the definition of genocide. What Israel tries to do in defending itself against Hamas's terrorist attacks doesn't fit the description of genocide.

The article reports that "at least 26 people were arrested Wednesday during a pro-Palestinian protest where demonstrators blocked a major New York City freeway inside John F. Kennedy International Airport, authorities said."

After the 26 arrests, "The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey told Fox News Digital that it was notified of protest activity on the freeway inside the busy airport around 11:30 a.m. The roadway reopened around 20 minutes later following the more than two dozen arrests."

Democrats don't hesitate in scraping the bottom of the barrel for their antisemitic activists. Then again, Democrats don't hesitate in picking any of their activists. Whether it's Antifa, BLM or pro-Palestinian protestors, Democrats apparently prefer picking anarchists and dirtbags. At some point, shouldn't Democrats reject activists who've hit rock bottom, then kept digging?

Make no mistake, either, that 95+ percent of the people that stopped traffic are Democrats or further left than that. These weren't Republicans. These weren't Libertarians. Then again, they might've attended Harvard, M.I.T. or UPenn.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more