Minnesota School Board Association, homegrown authoritarians edition

Just when I started worrying about running out of dictatorial authoritarian types, a school board meeting is scheduled and a handful of authoritarians appear.. When ISD 728 held its meeting on Dec. 11, 2023, 5 dictatorial types did their best to intimidate John Anderson and Mindy Freiberg into submission. That's a stupid thing to do.

The ISD 728 School Board voted to censure John Anderson and Mindy Freiberg last Monday. If you're wondering what Director Anderson and Director Freiberg were charged with, the Center for the American is on the case. Bill Walsh wrote "District lawyer and paid attack-dog Michael Waldspurger then breathlessly walked through the charges as if he was their boss and this was a year-end employee review. Here are the charges:

  • Late for meetings.
  • Unprepared for meetings.
  • Talked to legislators about district priorities without authority.
  • And the ultimate sin: failure to follow Policy 209.

ISD 728 wants to know which people are voting yes or no before debating the issue. Isn't that interesting? Why have the debate if you've already made up your mind?

Walter Hudson lays things out perfectly in this tweet:

I'm totally certain that the tail isn't designed to wag the dog. This is how dictatorships work. This isn't how constitutional republics work.

Duplicating injustices

Good ol’ Policy 209. A similar policy was used against Hastings School Board Member Mike Reis in 2021 during his censure, by the same law firm. In both cases, the school board chair let the attorneys speak in a condescending and disrespectful manner towards these elected officials.

Policy 209 comes from the Minnesota School Board Association (MSBA) model polices for school districts and serves as a code of conduct for members. Most districts in Minnesota have adopted the exact language of Policy 209 from the MSBA.

Why would anyone copy disciplinary language so it can be used from district-to-district statewide? The language of Policy 209 is filled with weasel words that can get twisted in any direction the School Board Chair wants to fit his/her needs. Then there's this:
The purpose of this policy is to assist the individual school board member in understanding his or her role as part of a school board and in recognizing the contribution that each member must make to develop an effective and responsible school board.
School boards don't serve the Superintendent. School boards serve the people that voted for them. This isn'ta Mickey Mouse game where the achievement gap keeps getting worse. The blueprint we have now has failed.

It isn't that it isn't working. That's too polite. It's that the union-driven model has failed and it's too expensive.

This video is of the ISD 728 board meeting from this past Monday:

A little over 59 minutes into the video, the person speaking says "the training includes protocols for talking with the Superintendent. And among other things that document makes clear that board members are supposed to communicate through the Superintendent and not with individual staff members."

That sounds a lot like an order to an independently-elected candidate. In a constitutional republic, independently-elected candidates aren't subject to ticky-tack rules like Policy 209. They're subject to things like elections and the U.S. and Minnesota constitutions.

Based on what we've read about the MSBA and ISD 728, they see school board members as rubberstamps for the Superintendent. That isn't checks and balances. That's homegrown authoritarianism. This type of governance must be uprooted immediatedly.

The best way to stop this tyranny of the majority is by organizing the citizenry, then winning school board, county commissioner and city council elections. At this point, there isn't a moment to lose. ISD 728 is proof that the education establishment is pretty well dug in. They'll need to be defeated repeatedly.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more