Ripping Biden's spending request to shreds

When it comes to spending taxpayers' money foolishly, Joe Biden is in a class by himself. He's the worst in U.S. presidential history. Biden's special spending request is outlined in this article. According to the article, Biden is requesting "$60 billion given to Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel", "$10 billion has been earmarked for humanitarian aid and $7 billion for the Indo-Pacific region."

Buried within last night's speech was the Biden administration's Ukraine policy. Biden said "On Ukraine, I’m asking Congress to make sure we can continue to send Ukraine the weapons they need to defend themselves and their country without interruption so Ukraine can stop Putin’s brutality in Ukraine."

Notice what isn't included in Biden's policy? It's pretty glaring, actually. He's all-but-officially admitted that the U.S. policy in Ukraine is another 20-year war. Notice that Biden said that he wants Ukraine to be able to "defend themselves." TRANSLATION: I want a $60,000,000,000 blank check for Ukraine -- for now. According to Biden's speech:

It’s a smart investment that’s going to pay dividends for American security for generations, help us keep American troops out of harm’s way, help us build a world that is safer, more peaceful, and more prosperous for our children and grandchildren.
We're $33,000,000,000,000+ in debt and Biden wants to get entangle the U.S. in another 'forever war'? How is that a "smart investment?"

The other foolish spending request from Biden is his request for $10,000,000,000 for "humanitarian assistance", aka Hamas assistance. The government in Gaza is run by Hamas. It's been that way since the Obama-Biden administration. We shouldn't ship $10,000,000,000 to Hamas under any circumstances. Notice, too, that the money isn't tied to the release of all hostages held in Gaza.

Unlike Donald Trump, I don't have a problem with sending Ukraine weapons if those weapons are used to defeat Putin's troops. Biden admitted that his policy will give us another forever war. I don't want that. I want to annihilate Putin. Period. That's what Reagan would advocate for. HINT: Whenever I'm on Reagan's side of a national security policy, I'm happy. Words straight from the horse's mouth:

I'm not ancient like Biden but I remember a time when the U.S. didn't get into wars unless it was with the intent of defeating evil. Biden is proposing spending $14,000,000,000 to fortify Israel. Virtually in the same sentence, he's requesting spending $10,000,000,000 on fortifying Hamas. If that isn't the definition of insanity, then insanity is without definition. How do you build a world "that is safer, more peaceful, and more prosperous" when you're spending almost equal amounts on Israel and the terrorists who killed Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023?

Finally, Republicans should force Biden to adopt a policy of 'Ukraine defeats Putin' before Biden gets another penny of U.S. taxpayer money. PERIOD.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more