Joe Biden vs. Mike Johnson, supporting Israel edition

Speaker Mike Johnson just announced that the House hopes to vote on a standalone appropriations bill to support Israel this Thursday. According to the article, "House Republicans have rolled out a bill giving $14.3 billion in aid to Israel, while cutting into cash President Biden allocated toward the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) last year."

That's where things get sticky. The article continues, saying "The 13-page bill released on Monday would completely offset the foreign aid by rescinding those funds from the Inflation Reduction Act passed last year. Specifically, it targets some of the $80 billion the package gave to the IRS." It's sticky because "Biden asked Congress to approve a mammoth $106 billion supplemental funding request with $14.3 billion for Israel, more than $60 billion for Ukraine, just over $13 billion for U.S. border security and an additional $10 billion in humanitarian assistance." Biden apparently thinks that massive deficit spending isn't inflationary.

Things get sticky for the administration, too, because House Democrats are stuck in the position of either voting to support Israel or getting crushed in 2024. Head? Republicans win. Tails? Democrats lose seats.

It's sounding like the Senate will pass the administration's bill as is. That sets up a showdown between the House and Senate. Let's consider the possibilities if that's the showdown that happens:

  1. The House accepts the Senate bill.
  2. The Senate accepts the House standalone bill.
  3. The House and Senate go to conference, where they iron out their differences.
  4. The House and Senate go to conference, were neither budges.

It isn't likely that the House budges on Israel funding:

I also suspect that there won't be Ukraine and border funding without policies attached to those bills. The border security bill as proposed by Biden isn't a security bill. I wouldn't bet on that getting a vote in the House. I'm betting the Senate bill gets split up the minute it reaches the House.

The House bill funds Israel's needs without spending recklessly. Speaker Johnson's messaging has been clear since attaining the speakership. Priorities will get funded while reckless spending ends on his watch. That means the end of omnibus (Christmas tree) bills.

The Senate's message is muddier. They're saying 'pass the bill as is so everything we need is funded plus some things we don't need are funded, too. Who cares if the debt in $33,600,000,000,000? (That's $33.6 Trillion.) If Republicans want to follow Mitch McConnell off a cliff on this bill, they'll get primaried the next time they're up for re-election.

Speaker Johnson is on the right side of the spending issue and the supporting Israel issue. People know that we've spent too much. Further, they know that supporting Israel doesn't require supporting Hamas assistance. When it's called humanitarian assistance, that's just spin for Hamas assistance because Hamas runs the government in Gaza. Anyone thinking that Hamas will ship humanitarian aid to the people isn't cynical enough.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more