Did Joe Biden benefit from Hunter Biden's shake-downs?

Things are heating up for Joe Biden, aka the Brand. This summer, Joe Biden said "Where's the money?" when he was accused of being part of Hunter Biden's pay-to-play scheme. I wrote this post yesterday to highlight a check paid out from Jim Biden's personal account to Joe Biden's personal account. The check memo line says that it was for a loan repayment. FYI- They're still searching for the original loan from Joe to Jim. Speculation is that loan is fiction.

That was Friday's news. Saturday is a different Biden fiasco story that will pose more problems for the Big Guy. This story, though, raises questions that are more difficult to explain away. RedState's Nick Arama wrote this article in which he highlights a sticker-to-explain transaction. According to the article, "Now there's a report that Joe Biden, the guy who always talked about how he was one of the poor senators, paid almost $2.75 million in cash for his Rehoboth Beach home in 2017." How's that for an attention-getting headline? That's where the plot takes another twist:

And making the transaction even stranger it was within weeks of a highly questionable text that Hunter had sent to Henry Zhao, an associate at Chinese oil giant CEFC asking to seal a deal worth $10 million a year.
Jamie Comer on the Jim Biden 'loan repayment' check:

Think about this question: how could Joe Biden, once one of the poorest senators in DC, pay $2,750,000 in cash for a Rehoboth Beach mansion and borrow $200,000 to his brother? Let's remember that the Bidens bought their Rehoboth Beach home in 2017, just shortly after he left office. Biden went from making $300,000-400,000 a year in most of those years to making 11,000,000+ in 2017. Biden made $4,500,000+ in 2018. How did Joe go from making $200,000-$400,000 while in office to making $11,000,000 in 2017? That sounds like he cashed in on being 'The Brand."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more