Will 2024 be about MAGA? Or will it be about a modified MAGA?

The day after the debate, Larry Kudlow opened his program with a panel analyzing the GOP Presidential Debate. The panel consisted of Mark Simone, Charlie Hurt and Joe Concha. Before Kudlow asked his first question, he said "I didn't think they made the case. I was dying for a good MAGA." The answer might lie in the question of whether Trump's America First agenda is exclusively about the economy and the border or whether it's about other things, too.

The original Trump America First agenda didn't focus much attention on school choice nor did it focus much on stopping the cartels and fentanyl poisonings. Part of that is due to the fact that COVID hadn't started and Trump's border attention was focused on building his wall. These days, school choice hadn't jumped up as a priority because COVID hadn't exposed Randi Weingarten's and Joe Biden's corruption.

Ron DeSantis has stepped into the gap regarding school choice and fentanyl poisonings. It's worthwhile to expand America First for those issues. MAGA's just changed. Kudlow just thinks that America First and MAGA is exclusively about economic issues. That thinking must change with our priorities. This is a classic example of inside-the-Beltway thinking:

First, it was obvious to me that the other candidates weren't going after Gov. DeSantis. Perhaps, that's because they recognize his intelligence and grasp of issues. RedState's Brandon Morse wrote that Gov. DeSantis' unfavorability dropped after the poll. He noted this, too:
Vivek Ramaswamy went from a 13-point unfavorability rating to 32 points. Tim Scott went from 12 to 23 points, and Asa Hutchinson went from 23 points to 47. Nikki Haley's seemed to increase as well, but not enough for it to be notable. Meanwhile, both Mike Pence and Chris Christie seemed to become slightly less unpopular, but both men still remain with high unfavorability ratings with 54 and 60 points respectively.
For all of the MSM adulation on Ramaswamy, it isn't a positive for his unfavorability ratings to triple in a single night. Tim Scott's unfavorability ratings doubled. Meanwhile, Gov. DeSantis' ratings dropped while his favorability ratings went up marginally: Gov. DeSantis did well in the debate because he had a mission of laying out a substantive agenda on the most important issues to voters. He didn't engage with the candidates because he was disciplined in a) highlighting his Florida accomplishments, then b) laying out his agenda for America. The 3 pundits and host mostly missed that. Until they start paying attention to the voters instead of just pontificating, they'll continue getting things wrong.

Trump benefits from an AF agenda that's solely focused on the economy. He's a fish out of water, though, as soon as AF includes education and stopping fentanyl poisonings in addition to the economy and border security.

Tell me what you think. Let me know if I got it right, mostly right or if you think I'm just dead wrong.

Comments

  1. You are quite correct that a focus on a wide range of "dysfunctions" in the country, PLUS particular plans to fix those, SHOULD win an election. We always hope that, but the Democrats never run on those issues, or solutions, rather purely on demonization of every Republican and common-sense proposal. Trump's brand of fighting back may not be unique but it is well known and it is needed in our candidate. That, plus knowing NOW where the deepest enemies are and "whom to fire first" is going to be critical to actually implementing that positive agenda. DeSantis did well, while Trump seems to concentrate on striking back at his persecutors. One longs for a simple contest of workable good ideas.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Joe Biden our Grifter-in-Chief?

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Maria Bartiromo's interrogation of Gov. Ron DeSantis