Shifting the goalposts on Hunter Biden

It's time to significantly shift the goalposts on the Hunter Biden plea deal. Rearranging the position of the terms isn't enough. First, U.S. Attorney for Delaware David Weiss should be required to eliminate special treatment of Hunter's gun charges. That's a felony. He should be required to serve time in a prison for that. Period.

The list of special favors directed at Hunter Biden is the subject of Kim Strassel's latest Potomac Watch column.

The column opens by saying "U.S. Attorney David Weiss is now offering to testify publicly in front of the House, and Republicans may need to book him for a week. It could take that long for the Delaware prosecutor to unwind his office’s growing list of Hunter Biden special favors, not to mention its half-truths and outright dissembling. The House Judiciary Committee needs to ask why it took 5 years to come up with Hunter's sweetheart deal. If that's the first question, the next question must be why IRS whistleblower weren't allowed to search any Biden properties.

Strassel continued, saying this:

Yet with the deal now in limbo, Mr. Weiss has an even bigger mess. Judge Noreika instructed the parties to return in several weeks with clarity on her role and details about Hunter’s risk of further prosecution. This gives Republicans more time to inform the judge about problems with the investigation. It’s also entirely possible that Hunter’s team won’t agree to any revised provisions that treat their client like other mere mortals.
That's definitely a possibility. If we want to return to a system of equal application of the laws for everyone, then Hunter needs to take accountability for committing a serious felony. Democrats constantly lecture society that we need to treat gun crimes harshly. Here's a golden opportunity to see if Democrats mean it or whether they just mean harshly treating gun crimes for the unwashed masses.

Hunter Biden's Sweetheart Deal collapses

This took virtually everyone by surprise:

Finally, there's this unexpected mess:
In short, the Justice Department has been caught playing games—and has no good answers. That’s because it never expected to have to give any. The Hunter deal was always premised on the notion that nobody would see the sausage. The Justice Department would release the bare bones of an agreement, the press would infuse it with credibility, and the judge would sign off. It didn’t count on two whistleblowers providing evidence of political favoritism, or on a court that questions why prosecutors are acting as a Hunter favor factory.
The DOJ tried being too clever by half. Now it's stuck with answering difficult questions from House Republicans, especially considering the fact that the Democrats can't deploy their nothing-to-see-here-just-move-along strategy.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more