Partisan impeachment vs. evidence-based impeachment

Get ready for the Democrats' onslaught of disinformation about Joe Biden's possible impeachment. This time, if an impeachment happens, it' because the House Oversight Committee, House Judiciary Committee and House Ways and Means Committee have conducted a thoroughly researched investigation into a) Joe Biden's family's criminal activity, b) collected tons of evidence like bank statements to the labyrinth of LLC shell companies, SARs (Suspicious Activity Reports) and eyewitness testimony from IRS whistleblowers like Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler and gotten invaluable information from Sen. Chuck Grassley's tireless investigations.

When Democrats impeached President Trump, the Democrats relied mostly on hearsay testimony that was corroborated by other hearsay witnesses. Lt. Col. Vindman testified that he was upset that President Trump didn't implement Vindman's policies. The chutzpah of the Leader of the Free World not listening to low-level staffer on foreign policy. Day-after-day, Democrats told us that the next day's witness would provide "bombshell testimony." By noon of the next day, that day's bombshell testimony had gotten decimated by Republicans.

Heather Parton is a partisan columnist for Salon.com. Her latest column includes this information:

One of the resolutions Greene filed on Biden's very first day in office claimed that he had tried "to influence the domestic policy of a foreign nation and accept benefits from foreign nationals in exchange for favors." That was, of course, based upon the bogus Ukraine scandal that prompted Donald Trump's first impeachment. Nothing would be more satisfying to Trump than to see Biden impeached for allegedly doing what Trump actually did when attempting to blackmail the Ukrainian president into smearing Biden.
How dare MTG say such truth. Joe Biden sold American policy in Ukraine by getting Viktor Shokin fired to protect Hunter Biden's lucrative job on the Burisma board of directors. Further, we've found out through a Confidential Human Source that Joe Biden extorted money from a high-ranking Burisma executive. The evidence for that is found in an FBI FD-1023 form. Additionally, we know that FD-1023 has had significant portions of the information verified through the Pittsburgh FBI Field Office before it was shipped to the U.S. Attorney for Delaware.

President Trump didn't blackmail President Zelenskiy. Here's the transcript of Trump's call with Zelenskiy:

TRUMP: Good because I heard you had a prosecutor who was very good and he was shut down and that’s really unfair. A lot of people are talking about that, the way they shut your very good prosecutor down and you had some very bad people involved. Mr. Giuliani is a highly respected man. He was the mayor of New York City, a great mayor, and I would like him to call you. I will ask him to call you along with the Attorney General. Rudy very much knows what’s happening and he is a very capable guy. ...

President Zelenskyy: I wanted to tell you about the prosecutor. First of all, I understand and I’m knowledgeable about the situation. Since we have won the absolute majority in our Parliament, the next prosecutor general will be 100% my person, my candidate, who will be approved, by the parliament and will start as a new prosecutor in September. He or she will look into the situation, specifically to the company that you mentioned in this issue. The issue of the investigation of the case is actually the issue of making sure to restore the honesty so we will take care of that and will work on the investigation of the case.

Trump didn't extort anyone, especially President Zelenskiy. Instead, he asked President Zelenskiy to find out why Viktor Shokin was fired after Shokin started investigating the Burisma corruption. It isn't Trump's fault that Joe Biden sold out the U.S. for money. Biden admitted it in this clip:

Shokin was solid. He was a threat to the Biden grift. That's why he had to get fired.

The impeachment investigation into Trump was sloppy and haphazard. They relied on hearsay witnesses and anonymous whistleblowers.

The investigation into Joe and Hunter Biden's grift machine has uncovered bank records, shell corporations, Treasury Department Suspicious Activity Reports involving the Biden family and proof of wire transfers from all across the world.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more