Open letter to Kevin McCarthy, Impeachment Inquiry Edition

To: Kevin McCarthy

From: Gary Gross, Impeachment Inquiry Activist

Subject: Impeachment Inquiry, not impeachment

Speaker McCarthy, It's time to stop the silliness about full-blown impeachment, at least at this point. Let me lay out my thinking for why an impeachment inquiry is best in this situation. First, as you know, it enhances your subpoena power. That, in turn, increases the House's investigative authority.

Since there won't be a conviction after impeachment, the goal should be to damage Joe Biden to the point that he's unelectable in 2024. That was the Democrats' goal with their first impeachment of then-President Trump.

The difference between the GOP's impeachment inquiry and the Democrat/Pelosi/Schiff impeachment is the seriousness of the GOP's impeachment inquiry. Use that enhanced subpoena power to get documents from Merrick Garland and David Weiss that pertain to their protection of Hunter Biden. Also, let's dig into whether they knew about Joe's involvement in this international grift.

Make this impeachment inquiry fast-paced. Gather as much information (bank records, suspicious activity reports, charts of the Biden Crime Syndicate's LLC labyrinth, etc.) as quickly as possible. The goal should be to compile as much evidence as possible for a comprehensive, exhaustive report. Include the testimony of Whistleblowers Shapley and Ziegler. Include Devon Archer's testimony, too.

When it's finished, censure Joe Biden. Enter the financial documents and testimony into the Congressional record so Democrats can be mercilessly ridiculed when they insist that there isn't any evidence that Joe Biden was connected with this grift. Include an executive summary of the report that includes the most damaging evidence and testimony.

Speaker McCarthy, these questions must get answered:

The key is putting together that comprehensive report. House Republicans need to be smart about this. This is the perfect time to expose Joe Biden's corruption. The only way to make that happen is by compiling a massive amount of irrefutable evidence. Get it done.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue...
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp...
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio...
Read more