Keystone Cop impeachment vs. legitimate impeachment

In 2019-2020, Democrats impeached Donald Trump based almost exclusively on hearsay testimony. Each night, Democrats told us that tomorrow's testimony would include "bombshell testimony." When the next morning rolled around, that promised bombshell testimony got taken apart by Jim Jordan, John Ratcliffe, Mike Turner, Mike Johnson or Elise Stefanik dissected that day's promised bombshell testimony. My favorite cross-examination came from Mike Turner when he cross-examined U.S. Ambassador to the E.U. Gordon Sondland. More on that in a little bit.

The other cross-examination that I got a chuckle from was Jim Jordan cross-examining Ambassador William Taylor. Then-Rep. Jordan said that he'd seen church prayer chains that were easier to decipher. I'd agree with that.

Let's call that impeachment unserious. Democrats simply hated Trump. The charges weren't serious and the Democrats' adherence to a fair, consistent process was nonexistent. Adam Schiff was a lying sack of BS from start-to-finish.

When attempting to remove a sitting president, you need evidence, not corroborated hearsay and gossip from partisan hacks like Lt. Col. Vindman.

The investigation into the Biden Crime Syndicate is a legitimate investigation. They've collected evidence like bank records, Suspicious Activity Reports, aka SARs, from the Treasury Department and bank records from overseas banks showing financial activity flowing in and out of the Bidens' shell companies. Further, they have an FBI document called an FD-1023, which was put together by a trusted FBI Confidential Human Source who's helped them convict many international businessmen.

Further, they've had IRS whistleblowers testify under penalty of perjury that the DOJ hindered their investigation while protecting Hunter Biden, aka the First Son, while ultimately protecting Joe Biden, aka POTUS. This Monday, Devon Archer, Hunter Biden's former business partner, will testify that he was part of 2 dozen business phone calls that included Joe Biden, the then-VP.

I could continue but you see the difference between the Democrats' partisan impeachment of Donald Trump and the Republicans' legitimate investigation of the Biden family. Finally, here's the video of Jim Jordan questioning Amb. Taylor:

This is Mike Turner's questioning of Amb. Sondland:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Tim Walz's Confederate Flag Fiasco

Image
After Minnesota's Democrats shoved the most controversial progressive legislation down Minnesotans' throats, gossip started popping up about Gov. Walz being interested in running for president . That's died off but Gov. Walz is still making headlines, this time for all the wrong reasons. First, Gov. Walz isn't the brightest bulb in the chandelier. Still, Gov. Walz is fighting against Minnesota's history. This Alpha News article quotes David Hann, the chairman of Minnesota's Republican Party, as saying " The flag the DFL has eliminated was a version of the historic flag our regiments fought under during the Civil War. Minnesota was the first state to offer troops to the Union cause in 1861 , beginning a long tradition of leading the nation in confronting injustice. The DFL quest to erase our history is repugnant and should be rejected." Gov. Walz, though, sees things differently. He's quoted as saying "Minnesota is a diverse state, it continue
Read more

What is Kamala Harris afraid of?

Image
Apparently, Kamala Harris suddenly loves debating. Let me rephrase that. Harris loves debating as long as the moderators are partisan hacks. She wants nothing to do with a debate moderated by Fox's Bret Baier and Martha MacCallum. She's afraid of Bret and Martha because a) they'll either fact-check both her and Trump or they won't fact-check either of them and b) Bret and Martha aren't afraid of asking follow-up questions. To a candidate whose answers are scripted and who isn't quick on her feet, the last thing you want is a follow-up question. Kamala fears follow-up questions like vampires hate wooden stakes, sunlight and holy water. Why has Kamala Harris avoided Fox News like the plague? The moderators/propagandists fact-checked Donald Trump aggressively but didn't fact-check Harris . Why didn't David Muir and Linsey Davis fact-check both candidates equally? Is it because Harris doesn't like fair fights? Perhaps she's just afraid of getting exp
Read more

Why is Joe Biden letting Hamas off the hook?

Image
It isn't disputable whether Joe Biden's administration is letting Hamas off the hook. That issue was settled months ago, when a spineless Joe Biden caved to activists interested in saving Hamas and thwarting the Israelis' attempt to defend themselves. Gerard Baker's op-ed highlights what's at stake for the U.S. if the terrorists are permitted to survive. In his op-ed, Baker wrote "If, under the pressure of internal Democratic politics and global public opinion, the Biden administration forces a 'cease-fire' that leaves our closest ally in the region short of victory over an enemy that seeks to destroy it, sooner or later we shall all pay the price." It's time to revisit George W. Bush's speech to a joint session of Congress on Sept. 20, 2001. It's required that we remind ourselves of one of its most important paragraphs. In talking about who committed the atrocities of 9/11, President Bush identified al-Qa'ida as "a collectio
Read more